2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2006.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the short-circuit current density of polymer solar cells based on P3HT:PCBM blend

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
162
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
162
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5 (solid line). Monestier [Monestier et al, 2007] have found this trend based on P3HT:PCBM systems. In their experiments, the active layer thickness is varied from a few tens nanometer to 215 nm.…”
Section: J Sc and The Active Layer Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 (solid line). Monestier [Monestier et al, 2007] have found this trend based on P3HT:PCBM systems. In their experiments, the active layer thickness is varied from a few tens nanometer to 215 nm.…”
Section: J Sc and The Active Layer Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This confirms the validity of our model. In the previous work, Monestier [Monestier et al, 2007]] modeled J SC and found that the predicted J SC is larger than the experimental data, especially for the thickness larger than 180 nm. They attributed this to the thickness dependence of optical constants.…”
Section: J Sc and The Active Layer Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…4 Photocurrent reaches theoretical values as high as 13 mA/ cm 2 , which is 35% larger than the largest short circuit current simulated in the same way for P3HT:PCBM blends. 15 Short circuit current losses in the 3:1 blend are evaluated to 31%, which is lower than for other compositions but still limiting the measured short circuit current.…”
Section: ͑8ј͒mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…If the surfaces are not passivated well then the decrease of current can be significant. However, even if we assume a value of 10 7 cm/s for surface recombination velocity, which is the maximum limiting value for most semiconductors [31,[34][35][36][37], we find that J sc is 9.53 mA/cm 2 for PCBM and 13.67 mA/cm 2 for CIGS layers so that total J sc is still 9% greater than the ideal total J sc of the solar cell without the intermediate layer. Although the light absorption is greater in PCBM than in CIGS, we note that the J sc is greater in CIGS than in PCBM.…”
Section: Different Materials For Subcellsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although the light absorption is greater in PCBM than in CIGS, we note that the J sc is greater in CIGS than in PCBM. The coulombic interaction between electrons and holes in organic material PCBM is much greater than that in direct bandgap inorganic material CIGS, which contributes to a significantly smaller carrier mobility in PCBM than that in CIGS [34,35]. As a result, the J sc in PCBM is smaller than that in CIGS despite a greater amount of photon absorption in PCBM.…”
Section: Different Materials For Subcellsmentioning
confidence: 98%