2018
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2018.2846219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Reverse Gate-Leakage Current in GaN-Channel HFETs: Realistic Assessment of Fowler–Nordheim and Leakage at Mesa Sidewalls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in evaluating the reverse gate-leakage of AlGaN/GaN HFETs Rahbardar et al have observed that at less negative values of V GS , gate-leakage is smaller in conventional mesa HFETs compared to devices with the same overall gate width but comprising of fin-type isolation features. They have justified this observation by substantiating the dominance of leakage at the gate-covered isolation feature sidewalls over the leakage through the AlGaN barrier at less negative values of V GS [6,14]. They have also attributed the lack of substantial difference between the values of I G for more negative values of V GS among these devices to the significance of leakage through the equally wide barrier of the explored devices over the sidewall leakage for this latter range of V GS [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, in evaluating the reverse gate-leakage of AlGaN/GaN HFETs Rahbardar et al have observed that at less negative values of V GS , gate-leakage is smaller in conventional mesa HFETs compared to devices with the same overall gate width but comprising of fin-type isolation features. They have justified this observation by substantiating the dominance of leakage at the gate-covered isolation feature sidewalls over the leakage through the AlGaN barrier at less negative values of V GS [6,14]. They have also attributed the lack of substantial difference between the values of I G for more negative values of V GS among these devices to the significance of leakage through the equally wide barrier of the explored devices over the sidewall leakage for this latter range of V GS [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…They have justified this observation by substantiating the dominance of leakage at the gate-covered isolation feature sidewalls over the leakage through the AlGaN barrier at less negative values of V GS [6,14]. They have also attributed the lack of substantial difference between the values of I G for more negative values of V GS among these devices to the significance of leakage through the equally wide barrier of the explored devices over the sidewall leakage for this latter range of V GS [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[4] However, process damages from the aforementioned "invasive" isolation techniques may lead to severe leakage path or electron-trapping effect, endangering device performance. [5][6][7][8] Compared with other leakage paths including gate leakage, surface leakage, and buffer leakage, isolation leakage plays an important role in determining the off-state characteristic of the HEMT device. [9] Through the optimization of passivation in isolation, [10][11][12][13] the off-state leakage current and the breakdown characteristic of the HEMT device can be dramatically improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%