2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the responses of grassland vegetation coverage to grazing disturbance in an alpine meadow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An NDVI value of zero indicates the presence of rock or bare soil and that NIR and R are approximately equal; positive values indicate the presence of vegetation cover and a positive correlation with coverage. An unfavorable effect of overgrazing on grassland is that livestock excessively feed on the branches and leaves of plants, causing the leaf area of plants to continuously decrease and the photosynthetic capacity to decrease, thereby affecting the plant's growth and development and reproductive capacity [65] and reducing vegetation coverage [66][67][68]; this result may affect the vegetation index. The threshold NDVI in this study was within a positive range, indicating that the grazing intensity threshold did not result in exposure of the land and avoided the problem of vegetation damage at lower levels due to overestimation of the threshold.…”
Section: Correlation Between Grazing Intensity and Vegetation Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An NDVI value of zero indicates the presence of rock or bare soil and that NIR and R are approximately equal; positive values indicate the presence of vegetation cover and a positive correlation with coverage. An unfavorable effect of overgrazing on grassland is that livestock excessively feed on the branches and leaves of plants, causing the leaf area of plants to continuously decrease and the photosynthetic capacity to decrease, thereby affecting the plant's growth and development and reproductive capacity [65] and reducing vegetation coverage [66][67][68]; this result may affect the vegetation index. The threshold NDVI in this study was within a positive range, indicating that the grazing intensity threshold did not result in exposure of the land and avoided the problem of vegetation damage at lower levels due to overestimation of the threshold.…”
Section: Correlation Between Grazing Intensity and Vegetation Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, disturbed grassland has less biomass than undisturbed grassland (Fu et al, 2012;Qin et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Mowing Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, while his scheme tested different values for the initial amount of grass, this paper focuses on keeping most parameters constant for more consistency in the comparisons of productivity between rotational and continuous grazing. Another mathematical model was recently proposed in [11], but their focus is quite different from ours. The model introduced here intends to provide an explanation of the benefits of rotational grazing in a general quantitative way.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%