2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.newast.2017.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the response of a standard accretion disc to stochastic viscous fluctuations

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We characterise the coherence and frequency dependent time lags of the the local accretion rate at different radii, finding that the fluctuations are coherent on timescales longer than the viscous time and also time delayed by the viscous travel time. The local dissipation/emission at different radii is also coherent on timescales longer than the viscous time, but with a time-delay that is appreciably smaller (in agreement with Ahmad et al (2018)). Finally, we recover non-linear variability even for rapidly modulated viscosity, and we reconcile differences with Cowperthwaite & Reynolds (2014) as being due to the form of the viscosity prescription (with the 𝛼-prescription introducing stronger non-linearities).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We characterise the coherence and frequency dependent time lags of the the local accretion rate at different radii, finding that the fluctuations are coherent on timescales longer than the viscous time and also time delayed by the viscous travel time. The local dissipation/emission at different radii is also coherent on timescales longer than the viscous time, but with a time-delay that is appreciably smaller (in agreement with Ahmad et al (2018)). Finally, we recover non-linear variability even for rapidly modulated viscosity, and we reconcile differences with Cowperthwaite & Reynolds (2014) as being due to the form of the viscosity prescription (with the 𝛼-prescription introducing stronger non-linearities).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…They employed a slightly simpler viscosity prescription, but did not restrict to small stochastic viscosity perturbations. Their numerical solution of the disc evolution equation confirmed that propagating fluctuations produced log-normal flux distributions, linear rms-flux relations, and frequency-dependent time-lags (on this last point, also see Ahmad et al 2018). Cowperthwaite & Reynolds (2014) suggested that the viscosity fluctuations needed to be driven sufficiently slowly, on the order of the viscous timescale, in order to produce this non-linear variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…According to Cowperthwaite & Reynolds (2014), the time-lag expected in stochastic propagation is frequency dependent. Ahmad et al (2018) have shown that for standard stable gas pressure dominated disk the propagation timescale is frequency dependent for frequencies higher than the local viscous time-scale. While these results are indicative, one should bear in mind that they are for standard optically thick disks, and it is not certain how quantitatively different would the results be for a hot optically thin, geometrically thick flow and when the propagation time being considered is from the transition region on wards.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Propagation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one interesting feature of these simulations is that the propagation time-scales can be frequency dependent and are not necessarily the same as the viscous ones. Using simple time dependent standard disk equations, Ahmad et al (2018) also showed that this is the case and quantify the frequency dependent behaviours. However, these results are for standard outer disks extending to the last stable orbit and it is not clear how the results would change if the standard outer disk is truncated at some distance from the black hole and has a hot inner flow (Yuan & Narayan 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the other hand, we follow numerically the flow dynamics so all the aspects of the variability model based on the idea of the propagating fluctuations (Lyubarskii 1997;Kotov et al 2001;Ingram & Done 2012) are automatically included by us. We do not have to restore to semi-analytical approach as done for example by Ingram & Klis (2013) who use analytic expressions for the power spectrum for models with propagating fluctuations but with zero-centred Lorentzian of a width 1/t visc , or by Ahmad et al (2018) for the geometrically thin disc who modelled the variability characteristic in the Soft State.…”
Section: Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%