2019
DOI: 10.3354/aei00308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the reproductive impact of aquaculture-produced sexually fertile triploids on conspecific diploid populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To minimize the potential genetic impact of hatchery-produced scallops on wild populations, there are different alternatives, including the systematic use of wild brooders (Yokota, Harada, & Iizuka, 2003), the use of completely genealogized brooders to ensure low inbreeding during a controlled reproduction process (Evans, Bartlett, Sweijd, Cook, & Elliott, 2004), the use of genetic markers to avoid inbred crosses (Liu et al, 2011), and the culture of triploids to prevent reproduction and genetic introgression in wild populations (Piferrer et al, 2009). However, this last method is not completely safe if the triploidization is not complete or if the triploids are not completely sterile (Winkler, Concha, & Concha, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize the potential genetic impact of hatchery-produced scallops on wild populations, there are different alternatives, including the systematic use of wild brooders (Yokota, Harada, & Iizuka, 2003), the use of completely genealogized brooders to ensure low inbreeding during a controlled reproduction process (Evans, Bartlett, Sweijd, Cook, & Elliott, 2004), the use of genetic markers to avoid inbred crosses (Liu et al, 2011), and the culture of triploids to prevent reproduction and genetic introgression in wild populations (Piferrer et al, 2009). However, this last method is not completely safe if the triploidization is not complete or if the triploids are not completely sterile (Winkler, Concha, & Concha, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%