2021
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Relationship between Critical BIM Attributes and Environmental Sustainability Criteria Using PLS-SEM Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study relied on descriptive analysis, including measures of central tendency and dispersion, and partial least squares modeling was used through a program Smart PLS. A PLS-SEM model needs to be carefully evaluated to provide valid and reliable outcomes [20]. An analytical approach is proposed to review PLS-SEM studies based on the field's most recent studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study relied on descriptive analysis, including measures of central tendency and dispersion, and partial least squares modeling was used through a program Smart PLS. A PLS-SEM model needs to be carefully evaluated to provide valid and reliable outcomes [20]. An analytical approach is proposed to review PLS-SEM studies based on the field's most recent studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the number of studies on BIM is increasing daily, it is noteworthy that the number of studies using this modelling method remains low. When the limited researches modelled the variable and examined BIM, it is evident that the studies focused on modelling the relationship between BIM attributes and environmental sustainability (Mirpanahi and Noorzai, 2021); collaborative innovation activities and BIM application (Qiao et al, 2021); impact of BIM drivers and awareness on the project lifecycle (Olanrewaju et al, 2021); risks associated with BIM implementation and adoption (Zhao et al, , 2018; work-based education and BIM adoption (Semaan et al, 2021); teamwork efficiency and BIM-based collaborative design (Wang et al, 2021); continuous use intention of BIM (Cui et al, 2021); factors hindering BIM implementation (Liao et al, 2019); factors predicting the behavioural resistance to BIM implementation (Wang et al, 2020); critical BIM adoption drivers across the infrastructure construction sector (Belay et al, 2021); the impact of organisation size and project type on BIM adoption (Hong et al, 2019); the BIM-related factors affecting the project performance (Tam et al, 2021); the strategies improving the organisational BIM capabilities (Munianday et al, 2022).…”
Section: Gaps In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the number of studies on BIM is increasing daily, it is noteworthy that the number of studies using this modelling method remains low. When the limited researches modelled the variable and examined BIM, it is evident that the studies focused on modelling the relationship between BIM attributes and environmental sustainability (Mirpanahi and Noorzai, 2021); collaborative innovation activities and BIM application (Qiao et al. , 2021); impact of BIM drivers and awareness on the project lifecycle (Olanrewaju et al.…”
Section: Research Background and Gaps In Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al 2021;Fokaides PA. et al 2020). BIM provides essential data and information for projects and encompasses several valuable functions for building performance analysis method (Liu S. et al 2015), materials and resources, energy and atmosphere, sustainable sites, indoor environmental quality, and innovation (Mirpanahi MV. et al 2021;Huang, B. et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%