2010
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/709/2/632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MODELING THE RADIO EMISSION FROM Cyg OB2 NO. 5: A QUADRUPLE SYSTEM?

Abstract: Fifty observations at frequencies between 1.4 GHz and 43 GHz of the 6.6-day O6.5-7+O5.5-6 binary Cyg OB2 #5 using the Very Large Array over 20 years are re-examined. The aim is to determine the location and character of the previously detected variable radio emission. The radio emission from the system consists of a primary component that is associated with the binary, and a non-thermal source (NE), 0.8 ′′ to the NE of the binary that has been ascribed to a wind-collision region (WCR) between the stellar winds… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
90
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
90
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Until a few years ago, this system was known to be a triple system, made of a close early-type binary with a much more distant B-type third component. The presence of a fourth star in this multiple system is strongly suggested by a well-defined radio variability (of non-thermal origin) on a time scale of about 6.7 years (Kennedy et al 2010). Some additional convincing information comes from X-ray observations revealing a hard spectrum in the soft X-ray domain (Linder et al 2009).…”
Section: Appendix A: the Cataloguementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Until a few years ago, this system was known to be a triple system, made of a close early-type binary with a much more distant B-type third component. The presence of a fourth star in this multiple system is strongly suggested by a well-defined radio variability (of non-thermal origin) on a time scale of about 6.7 years (Kennedy et al 2010). Some additional convincing information comes from X-ray observations revealing a hard spectrum in the soft X-ray domain (Linder et al 2009).…”
Section: Appendix A: the Cataloguementioning
confidence: 76%
“…The system is a nonthermal radio emitter, which is an indication of the presence of a WWC. Strangely, the radio emission of the binary is not modulated with the 6.6 d period, but with a period of about 6.7 yr. Kennedy et al (2010), therefore, deduced that a third star exists in the system, orbiting the binary in a 6.7 yr orbit. This third component can be associated with a late O/early B-type star (Kennedy et al 2010).…”
Section: The Object Cyg Ob2 #5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strangely, the radio emission of the binary is not modulated with the 6.6 d period, but with a period of about 6.7 yr. Kennedy et al (2010), therefore, deduced that a third star exists in the system, orbiting the binary in a 6.7 yr orbit. This third component can be associated with a late O/early B-type star (Kennedy et al 2010). These authors proposed several possible orbital solutions for the tertiary orbit that could explain the radio emission.…”
Section: The Object Cyg Ob2 #5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cyg OB2 #5 system is a 6.6 d spectroscopic binary, but the 6.7 yr period in the radio fluxes indicates the presence of a third companion. Furthermore, a CWR is visible at radio wavelengths between Cyg OB2 #5 and a nearby B-type star, implying that Cyg OB2 #5 could be a quadruple system (Kennedy et al 2010;Dzib et al 2013). From spectroscopy we know that HD 167971 is a 3.3 d binary, with a third component which may or may not be gravitationally bound (Leitherer et al 1987).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%