Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5947-4_110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Propagation of Bounded Beams Through Curved Interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first method makes use of the paraxial approximation and Stokes' theorem to transform the surface integral model into a simpler model where the total wave field response is decomposed into two parts: (1) a direct plane wave component that exists only within the "main beam" of the transducer, and (2) an edge wave that arises from the radiation of waves through the interface from the transducer rim. Since the form of this response is the same as that obtained in boundary diffraction wave theory [21], we call this result the boundary diffraction wave (BDW) paraxial model. Our BDW paraxial model is essentially the generalization of the original approach of Thompson and Gray [ 101 for this problem to the case where the wave fields can be evaluated at an arbitrary field point in the solid, and is the extension to oblique incidence of the boundary diffraction wave model previously used by Schmerr et al [21] for the radiation of a transducer through an interface at normal Downloaded by [Monash University Library] at 07:00 05 June 2016 incidence (note, however, that the normal incidence BDW model in reference [21] does not rely on the paraxial approximation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The first method makes use of the paraxial approximation and Stokes' theorem to transform the surface integral model into a simpler model where the total wave field response is decomposed into two parts: (1) a direct plane wave component that exists only within the "main beam" of the transducer, and (2) an edge wave that arises from the radiation of waves through the interface from the transducer rim. Since the form of this response is the same as that obtained in boundary diffraction wave theory [21], we call this result the boundary diffraction wave (BDW) paraxial model. Our BDW paraxial model is essentially the generalization of the original approach of Thompson and Gray [ 101 for this problem to the case where the wave fields can be evaluated at an arbitrary field point in the solid, and is the extension to oblique incidence of the boundary diffraction wave model previously used by Schmerr et al [21] for the radiation of a transducer through an interface at normal Downloaded by [Monash University Library] at 07:00 05 June 2016 incidence (note, however, that the normal incidence BDW model in reference [21] does not rely on the paraxial approximation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Schmerr et al [8]). The remaining surface integral over the transducer face can be evaluated with edge elements or a numerical technique of the user's choice.…”
Section: Curved Interface Beam Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the diffraction coefficient, cr (Spm), is given by and e and g( l/J) are given explicitly in [8], DTo and D!o are the ray paths in the first and second media, respectively, and P e is the radius from the origin of the fixed ray to the edge of the transducer. The PBDW model is extremely efficient to calculate, making it an excellent candidate for use in real-time ultrasonic inspection simulators.…”
Section: Curved Interface Beam Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9. The Gauss-Hermite [7,8,9], the multi-Gaussian [10,11], and the boundary diffraction models [12,13,14] are all paraxial models. Other models have been developed that may be more detailed but also more computationally intensive than these [15,16,17,18,19,20,21].…”
Section: Theories Of Interaction With Probe Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%