2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the potential for closing quinoa yield gaps under varying water availability in the Bolivian Altiplano

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is important to point out that fluctuation of expected quinoa yield between rainfed and def icit irrigation might be up to three times greater for a similar ETa, that is the result of the timing of the water application under deficit irrigation, which is applied during flowering and early grain filling phase, compared to rainfed conditions that cannot be controlled, which is a competitive advantage of this technology for stabilize quinoa yield. Quinoa yield for the Southern Bolivian Altiplano under rainfed and different irrigation strategies reported by several authors varied from 0.3 to 2.1 ton ha -1 (Aguilar & Jacobsen, 2003;Bosque et al, 2003;García et al, 2003;Geerts et al, 2008bGeerts et al, , 2009a. These confirm the results found in the present study where quinoa yield was well simulated by the AquaCrop model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, it is important to point out that fluctuation of expected quinoa yield between rainfed and def icit irrigation might be up to three times greater for a similar ETa, that is the result of the timing of the water application under deficit irrigation, which is applied during flowering and early grain filling phase, compared to rainfed conditions that cannot be controlled, which is a competitive advantage of this technology for stabilize quinoa yield. Quinoa yield for the Southern Bolivian Altiplano under rainfed and different irrigation strategies reported by several authors varied from 0.3 to 2.1 ton ha -1 (Aguilar & Jacobsen, 2003;Bosque et al, 2003;García et al, 2003;Geerts et al, 2008bGeerts et al, , 2009a. These confirm the results found in the present study where quinoa yield was well simulated by the AquaCrop model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…those found by Hexem & Heady (1978), Taylor et al (1983), DeTar (2008 and Geerts et al (2009a). Moreover, it is important to point out that fluctuation of expected quinoa yield between rainfed and def icit irrigation might be up to three times greater for a similar ETa, that is the result of the timing of the water application under deficit irrigation, which is applied during flowering and early grain filling phase, compared to rainfed conditions that cannot be controlled, which is a competitive advantage of this technology for stabilize quinoa yield.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The global applicability of AquaCrop is dependent on its being tested in a diverse environment under differing soil conditions, crops, agronomic practices, and climatic conditions [32,33] . For example, the calibration and evaluation of the performance of AquaCrop has been carried out for quinoa [34] , wheat [35][36][37][38][39] , sorghum [40] , maize [28,[41][42][43][44][45][46] , potato [32,47] , and cabbage [48,49] . Previous studies have demonstrated that AquaCrop is able to accurately simulate crop canopy cover, biomass yield and grain yield in diverse environments and under a variety of meteorological conditions and management practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%