2007 Winter Simulation Conference 2007
DOI: 10.1109/wsc.2007.4419864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the performance of low latency queueing for emergency telecommunications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, we anticipated that run times in OPNET Modeler would be longer than in our custom simulator, which has much less overhead. Later comparisons (see Masi et al (2007aMasi et al ( , 2007b) showed that our custom simulator run times for a router using CBWFQ were about one tenth that of the OPNET run times.…”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, we anticipated that run times in OPNET Modeler would be longer than in our custom simulator, which has much less overhead. Later comparisons (see Masi et al (2007aMasi et al ( , 2007b) showed that our custom simulator run times for a router using CBWFQ were about one tenth that of the OPNET run times.…”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We were first interested in developing a simulation model for a Low Latency Queueing (LLQ) system (see Masi (2007aMasi ( , 2007b. That system is composed of a Priority Queueing (PQ) module and a CBWFQ module.…”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section we compare the approximation presented above with the results of simulation models we have developed [9], [15]. We look at two examples-one with five classes and the other with six.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particular scheduling technique utilized is a virtual finish time algorithm described in the literature (Golestani 1994). Its characteristics are described in Fischer, Masi and Garbin (2007). The weights assigned to the traffic classes are designed to assure adequate performance for the video and missioncritical data traffic under normal loads.…”
Section: Router Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%