2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the performance of batch ultrafiltration of synthetic fruit juice and mosambi juice using artificial neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rai and others [30] used ANN to describe the permeate flux and permeate concentration (total soluble solid) profiles during the ultrafiltration of synthetic fruit juice and mosambi (sweet lime) juice dynamically. They predicted the permeate flux and total soluble solid of permeate as a function of transmembrane pressure, sucrose, pectin concentration in the feed and the processing time.…”
Section: U Mosambi (Sweet Lime) Juicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rai and others [30] used ANN to describe the permeate flux and permeate concentration (total soluble solid) profiles during the ultrafiltration of synthetic fruit juice and mosambi (sweet lime) juice dynamically. They predicted the permeate flux and total soluble solid of permeate as a function of transmembrane pressure, sucrose, pectin concentration in the feed and the processing time.…”
Section: U Mosambi (Sweet Lime) Juicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, even quite simple network architectures can reproduce highly complex non-linear behaviour. Recently, ANNs have been employed in a number of studies to model the flux dynamics of crossflow membrane filtration processes, including microfiltration [22], [23], [24], [25], [26] and [27], but have not yet been employed for dead-end microfiltration of particulate or cellular suspensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dornier et al [20] 1995 MF FFNN a -MLP b SL c -BP d Modeling of cross-flow MF Niemi et al [21] 1995 RO FFNN-MLP SL-BP Simulation of RO membrane separation Bowen et al [22] 1998 UF FFNN-MLP SL-BP Prediction of the rate of cross-flow membrane UF of colloids Delgrange et al [23] 1998 UF FFNN-MLP SL-BP-QNLA e Prediction of UF transmembrane pressure in drinking water production Hamachi et al [24] 1999 MF RN f USL g Modeling of cross-flow MF of bentonite suspension Teodosiu et al [25] 2000 UF FFNN-MLP SL-BP Predicting the time dependence of flux evolution in UF Bowen et al [26] 2000 NF FFNN-MLP CGM h -SCG i Predicting salt rejections at NF Jafar and Zilouchian [27] 2001 RO FFNN-MLP and RBF j SL-BP Modeling of an RO water desalination Bhattacharjee and Singh [28] 2002 UF FFNN-MLP SL-BP Modeling of a continuous stirred UF process Razavi et al [29] 2003 UF FFNN-MLP SL-BP Prediction of milk UF performance Shetty et al [30] 2003 NF FFNN-MLP SL-BP-LMT k Prediction of contaminant removal and membrane fouling during NF Lee et al [31] 2004 FC FFNN-MLP SL-BP Modeling of polymer electrolyte membrane FC performance Aydiner et al [32] 2005 MF FFNN-MLP SL-BP Modeling of flux decline in cross-flow MF Zhao et al [33] 2005 RO and NF FFNN-MLP and NRBF l SL-BP Predicting RO/NF water quality Abbas and Al-Bastaki [34] 2005 RO FFNN-MLP SL-BP-LMT Modeling of an RO water desalination Rai et al [35] 2005 UF FFNN-MLP SL-BP Modeling batch UF of synthetic fruit juice and mosambi juice Geissler et al [36] 2005 MBR SRN m (EN n ) SL-BP Modeling of capillary modules in MBR Ou and Achenie [37] 2005 FC FFNN-MLP and RBF SL-BP Modeling of proton exchange membranes Chen and Kim [38] 2006 FT FFNN-MLP and RBF SL-BP-LMT Prediction of permeate flux decline in cross-flow membrane FT Cinar et al [39] 2006 MBR CFNN o -MLP SL-BP…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%