AIP Conference Proceedings 2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3211826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Local Warm∕Hot Bubble

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we review the modeling of the Local Bubble (LB) with special emphasis on the progress we have made since the last major conference "The Local Bubble and Beyond (I)" held in Garching in 1997. Since then new insight was gained into the possible origin of the LB, with a moving group crossing its volume during the last 10 -15 Myr being most likely responsible for creating a local cavity filled with hot recombining gas. Numerical high resolution 3D simulations of a supernova driven inhomogen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of the dynamical analysis of M33 performed by Puerari (1993), narrow features initially distributed in a spiral arm pattern would be completely smeared out by differential galactic rotation on timescales of 2 − 3 × 10 8 yr. For such narrow features to survive we need a much shorter cooling timescale (assuming radiative cooling is the dominant process) implying a filling factor much less than unity. Setting η ∼ 10 −3 gives a cooling timescale of 6 × 10 6 years, comparable to the inferred lifetime of hot bubbles observed in our own Galaxy (Egger & Aschenbach 1995;Breitschwerdt, de Avillez & Baumgartner 2009). As noted earlier, this is also roughly the timescale on which the soft Xray production maximises following the onset of a starformation episode.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…On the basis of the dynamical analysis of M33 performed by Puerari (1993), narrow features initially distributed in a spiral arm pattern would be completely smeared out by differential galactic rotation on timescales of 2 − 3 × 10 8 yr. For such narrow features to survive we need a much shorter cooling timescale (assuming radiative cooling is the dominant process) implying a filling factor much less than unity. Setting η ∼ 10 −3 gives a cooling timescale of 6 × 10 6 years, comparable to the inferred lifetime of hot bubbles observed in our own Galaxy (Egger & Aschenbach 1995;Breitschwerdt, de Avillez & Baumgartner 2009). As noted earlier, this is also roughly the timescale on which the soft Xray production maximises following the onset of a starformation episode.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The presence of 60 Fe in deep-sea measurements on Earth has triggered the study of the LB-sun interaction, see [6]. We now select some theoretical efforts that model the LB, as follows: the one-dimensional hydrocode with non-equilibrium ion evolution and dust, see [7,8]; different tests to explain the FUSE data, see [9,10]; the use of the parallel adaptive mesh refinement code EAF-PAMR, see [11]; hydrodynamical simulations of the LB, see [12]; and the study of the 3D structure of the magnetic field, see [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%