2014
DOI: 10.3390/polym6051489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Kinetics of Enhanced Photo-Polymerization under a Collimated and a Reflecting Focused UV Laser

Abstract: This study explored the kinetics of ultraviolet (UV) laser photoinitiated polymerization in thick polymer systems to achieve improved polymerization efficiency and uniformity. The modeling system comprised an incident UV laser and its reflecting beam, which was focused by a concave mirror to compensate for the exponential decay in the absorbing medium. The polymerization kinetic equation was numerically solved for the initiator concentration. The crossover time was calculated and compared among single beam, tw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the modeling system shown in Fig 1B, the UV light intensity I ( z , t ) and RF concentration C(z,t) in the corneal stroma (for the epi-off case) may be described by a set of coupled first-order differential equations, or by the integral equations [8–11] as follows, with the time-dependent RF concentration given by, Where a = 83.6 λϕε 1 , with ϕ being the quantum yield and λ being the UV light wavelength; ε 1 and ε 2 are the extinction coefficients of RF and the photolysis product, respectively. I 0 is the initial UV light surface intensity, or I(z = t = 0) = I 0 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the modeling system shown in Fig 1B, the UV light intensity I ( z , t ) and RF concentration C(z,t) in the corneal stroma (for the epi-off case) may be described by a set of coupled first-order differential equations, or by the integral equations [8–11] as follows, with the time-dependent RF concentration given by, Where a = 83.6 λϕε 1 , with ϕ being the quantum yield and λ being the UV light wavelength; ε 1 and ε 2 are the extinction coefficients of RF and the photolysis product, respectively. I 0 is the initial UV light surface intensity, or I(z = t = 0) = I 0 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more realistic systems, the distribution of the photoinitiator is non-uniform and the UV light may still be absorbed by the photolysis product besides the absorption of the monomer. To improve the efficiency and spatial uniformity (in the depth direction) particularly in a thick system (>1.0 cm), we have presented the numerical results using a focused light [24] and two-beam approach [25] for the case of uniform PS distribution; and analytic and computer modeling for the non-uniform case [26]. Optimal efficacy in light-activated biomedical systems and nonlinear laws versus linear Beer-Lambert law were also reported by Lin [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…5 i.e., the anterior portion always has less efficacy (gelation). Strategy using two-side illumination [6,8] and focused light [7] were proposed to improve the overall efficacy and uniformity of the GSP. For class (b), the PSCD profile is controlled by the diffusion time (or the value of D).…”
Section: Strategies For Optimal Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the kinetics of PPS becomes very complex and the process is governed by multiple factors. To improve the efficiency of PPS particularly in a thick system (>1.0 cm), we have presented the numerical results using a focused light [7] and two-beam approach for the case of uniform PS distribution [8] and analytic comprehensive modeling for the non-uniform case [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%