2011
DOI: 10.1890/09-1657.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the impacts of the European green crab on commercial shellfisheries

Abstract: Coastal resource managers are often tasked with managing coastal ecosystems that are stressed by overexploitation, climate change, contaminants, and habitat loss, as well as biological invasions. Therefore, managers increasingly need better economic data to help them prioritize their management strategies and distribute their increasingly limited resources to those strategies. Despite frequent pronouncements about the substantial ecological and economic impacts of invasive species, there have been few if any r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in line with the Plass-Johnson et al (2010), who attributed 35 % of the mussel losses to predation and with estimations of Grosholz et al (2011) who extrapolated results from Beal and Kraus (2002) and from (Beal 2006) where predation losses varied between 13 and 55 %. Murray et al (2007) estimated that losses as a result of shore crab predation are 9.5 % over 12 months in the Menai Street in Wales, which is substantially lower than in the present study.…”
Section: Crab Predationsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are in line with the Plass-Johnson et al (2010), who attributed 35 % of the mussel losses to predation and with estimations of Grosholz et al (2011) who extrapolated results from Beal and Kraus (2002) and from (Beal 2006) where predation losses varied between 13 and 55 %. Murray et al (2007) estimated that losses as a result of shore crab predation are 9.5 % over 12 months in the Menai Street in Wales, which is substantially lower than in the present study.…”
Section: Crab Predationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The feeding rate of shore crabs depends on the predator-prey size ratio, where the predation rate shows a rapid decrease with increasing mussel size (Crothers 1968;Mascaró and Seed 2001;Murray et al 2007;Kamermans et al 2009). The impact of crab predation over the entire culture cycle has been estimated to range from 9.5 % (Murray et al 2007) to 52 % mussel loss (Grosholz et al 2011). These data are extrapolations of laboratory results on feeding rates to estimated field abundances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These results are in line with the Plass-Johnson et al (2010), who attributed 35% of the mussel losses to predation and with estimations of Grosholz et al (2011) who extrapolated results from Beal and Kraus (2002) and from (Beal 2006) where predation losses varied between 13% and 55%. Murray et al (2007b) estimated that losses as a result of shore crab predation are 9.5% over 12 months in the Menai Street in Wales, which is substantially lower than in the present study.…”
Section: Crab Predationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our results show that shore crabs take a substantial share in the seeding losses and suggest that the effect of shore crab predation on mussel biomass production is higher than previous studies would suggest (Murray et al 2007b, Grosholz et al 2011. Effect sizes, such as the 10% suggested by Murray et al (2007b), may apply to already established mussel populations on culture plots, or on natural mussel beds.…”
Section: Shore Crabsmentioning
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation