2021
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2020.3019170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Impact of Sensitivity Distribution Variations of Tetrapolar Impedance Configurations in Microfluidic Analytical Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This estimated performance compares very favourably with the regulatory limit and other LOD and LOQ values from Table I. Such an advancement has great potential to enhance modern bio-microsystem sensors [69], [70]. Our work also has the potential to advance beyond lock-in fluorescence systems that were not largely applied for biological applications [71].…”
Section: (B)supporting
confidence: 56%
“…This estimated performance compares very favourably with the regulatory limit and other LOD and LOQ values from Table I. Such an advancement has great potential to enhance modern bio-microsystem sensors [69], [70]. Our work also has the potential to advance beyond lock-in fluorescence systems that were not largely applied for biological applications [71].…”
Section: (B)supporting
confidence: 56%
“…Depending on the application, improvements to the bipolar topology can be made by employing a four-electrode/tetrapolar configuration, where one pair of electrodes is used to inject the current while the other one carries out the sensing voltage. In the latter, one pair of electrodes injects the current, while another pair measures the voltage, greatly minimising the effects of the electrode–electrolyte interface and enhancing measurement accuracy [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary source of errors in bipolar bioimpedance systems, including typical corneometers, relates to the electrode–electrolyte double layer introducing a contact impedance that can significantly interfere with the measured value [ 10 ]. As measurements are taken across a range of frequencies (typically up to 1 MHz), the detrimental effect of the contact impedance varies significantly, especially when small electrodes and/or low frequencies are employed [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation