Abstract:The correct evaluation of the reproductive number R for COVID-19 is central in the quantification of the potential scope of the pandemic and the selection of an appropriate course of action. In most models, R is modeled as a constant -effectively averaging out the inherent variability of the transmission process due to varying individual contact rates, population densities, or temporal factors amongst many. Yet, due to the exponential nature of epidemic growth, the error due to this simplification can be rapid… Show more
“…In order to model the uncertainty associated with the aerosol transmission model, we added a sampling step at the end of the Jimenez and Peng pipeline. This allowed us to account for individual variations in infectious participants’ ability to spread the disease and to remain consistent with the extensive literature on the heavy-tailed Pareto nature of COVID-19 transmission and superspreading [ 24 - 27 ]. For each infected participant, we sampled the number of quanta that they exhale using a Pareto distribution with shape θ = 1.16 and rate η = θ/(θ – 1) q exhalation .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This is because a singular focus on the expected outcome precludes consideration of the distribution of all possible outcomes, including worst-case scenarios. In the context of COVID-19, where the majority of new cases has been shown to be caused by a minority of index cases [ 24 - 26 ], the modelling of tail events and potential super-spreader phenomena takes on significant importance for risk assessment [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Background
Modelling COVID-19 transmission at live events and public gatherings is essential to controlling the probability of subsequent outbreaks and communicating to participants their personalized risk. Yet, despite the fast-growing body of literature on COVID-19 transmission dynamics, current risk models either neglect contextual information including vaccination rates or disease prevalence or do not attempt to quantitatively model transmission.
Objective
This paper attempted to bridge this gap by providing informative risk metrics for live public events, along with a measure of their uncertainty.
Methods
Building upon existing models, our approach ties together 3 main components: (1) reliable modelling of the number of infectious cases at the time of the event, (2) evaluation of the efficiency of pre-event screening, and (3) modelling of the event’s transmission dynamics and their uncertainty using Monte Carlo simulations.
Results
We illustrated the application of our pipeline for a concert at the Royal Albert Hall and highlighted the risk’s dependency on factors such as prevalence, mask wearing, and event duration. We demonstrate how this event held on 3 different dates (August 20, 2020; January 20, 2021; and March 20, 2021) would likely lead to transmission events that are similar to community transmission rates (0.06 vs 0.07, 2.38 vs 2.39, and 0.67 vs 0.60, respectively). However, differences between event and background transmissions substantially widened in the upper tails of the distribution of the number of infections (as denoted by their respective 99th quantiles: 1 vs 1, 19 vs 8, and 6 vs 3, respectively, for our 3 dates), further demonstrating that sole reliance on vaccination and antigen testing to gain entry would likely significantly underestimate the tail risk of the event.
Conclusions
Despite the unknowns surrounding COVID-19 transmission, our estimation pipeline opens the discussion on contextualized risk assessment by combining the best tools at hand to assess the order of magnitude of the risk. Our model can be applied to any future event and is presented in a user-friendly RShiny interface. Finally, we discussed our model’s limitations as well as avenues for model evaluation and improvement.
“…In order to model the uncertainty associated with the aerosol transmission model, we added a sampling step at the end of the Jimenez and Peng pipeline. This allowed us to account for individual variations in infectious participants’ ability to spread the disease and to remain consistent with the extensive literature on the heavy-tailed Pareto nature of COVID-19 transmission and superspreading [ 24 - 27 ]. For each infected participant, we sampled the number of quanta that they exhale using a Pareto distribution with shape θ = 1.16 and rate η = θ/(θ – 1) q exhalation .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This is because a singular focus on the expected outcome precludes consideration of the distribution of all possible outcomes, including worst-case scenarios. In the context of COVID-19, where the majority of new cases has been shown to be caused by a minority of index cases [ 24 - 26 ], the modelling of tail events and potential super-spreader phenomena takes on significant importance for risk assessment [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Background
Modelling COVID-19 transmission at live events and public gatherings is essential to controlling the probability of subsequent outbreaks and communicating to participants their personalized risk. Yet, despite the fast-growing body of literature on COVID-19 transmission dynamics, current risk models either neglect contextual information including vaccination rates or disease prevalence or do not attempt to quantitatively model transmission.
Objective
This paper attempted to bridge this gap by providing informative risk metrics for live public events, along with a measure of their uncertainty.
Methods
Building upon existing models, our approach ties together 3 main components: (1) reliable modelling of the number of infectious cases at the time of the event, (2) evaluation of the efficiency of pre-event screening, and (3) modelling of the event’s transmission dynamics and their uncertainty using Monte Carlo simulations.
Results
We illustrated the application of our pipeline for a concert at the Royal Albert Hall and highlighted the risk’s dependency on factors such as prevalence, mask wearing, and event duration. We demonstrate how this event held on 3 different dates (August 20, 2020; January 20, 2021; and March 20, 2021) would likely lead to transmission events that are similar to community transmission rates (0.06 vs 0.07, 2.38 vs 2.39, and 0.67 vs 0.60, respectively). However, differences between event and background transmissions substantially widened in the upper tails of the distribution of the number of infections (as denoted by their respective 99th quantiles: 1 vs 1, 19 vs 8, and 6 vs 3, respectively, for our 3 dates), further demonstrating that sole reliance on vaccination and antigen testing to gain entry would likely significantly underestimate the tail risk of the event.
Conclusions
Despite the unknowns surrounding COVID-19 transmission, our estimation pipeline opens the discussion on contextualized risk assessment by combining the best tools at hand to assess the order of magnitude of the risk. Our model can be applied to any future event and is presented in a user-friendly RShiny interface. Finally, we discussed our model’s limitations as well as avenues for model evaluation and improvement.
“…Many tools and methods were used by researchers in these scenarios, including predictions based on the Bayesian model [52,53], SIR models [54,55], an agent-based model and a deterministic compartmental model [56], fractional models [57], and a modified SEIR compartmental model [58].…”
The article presents a prediction regarding the development of passenger transport services, considering random factors related to the COVID-19 pandemic situation, based on scenario methods. The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic has significantly affected the way passenger transport services are provided, mainly due to sanitary restrictions imposed by epidemiological services. At the same time, the communication behaviour of travellers has also changed, which in turn has influenced the demand for these services. The following study investigates transport service future development issues from multiple perspectives, including demand analysis, the selection of major factors influencing the development of passenger transport for individual Polish passengers using an online questionnaire, and scenario designs. The main purpose of this article is to build various scenarios for the development of passenger transport, considering changes in the demand for these services and factors related to their perception by the users of the means of transport. The main factors influencing the future development of passenger transport and the possible scenarios can support public transport service providers in planning their services in the post-shutdown phase as well as in their respective modelling development requirements. This can support the planning process with decision-making based on future behavioural trends.
“…In fact, the constraint R 0 ≤ 1 is known to be the condition for the almost sure extinction of the epidemic. Note however that R 0 is observed to be very variable in practice, especially for COVID-19 (see the discussions of Elliott and Gouriéroux 2020;Donnat and Holmes 2021).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.