2014
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-14-124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Effects of Temperature, Sodium Chloride, and Green Tea and Their Interactions on the Thermal Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes in Turkey

Abstract: The interactive effects of heating temperature (55 to 65°C), sodium chloride (NaCl; 0 to 2%), and green tea 60% polyphenol extract (GTPE; 0 to 3%) on the heat resistance of a five-strain mixture of Listeria monocytogenes in ground turkey were determined. Thermal death times were quantified in bags that were submerged in a circulating water bath set at 55, 57, 60, 63, and 65°C. The recovery medium was tryptic soy agar supplemented with 0.6% yeast extract and 1% sodium pyruvate. D-values were analyzed by second-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This methodology was occasionally already applied in the 1980s and 1990s, but has been widely used in recent literature. An extensive list of example studies exploiting this approach is provided in Table 1 , both for microbial growth [ 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 ] and thermal inactivation [ 55 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 ], with a focus on early and recent examples. Interestingly, however, this predictive microbiology approach bears some similarities to the traditional challenge testing approach, in which microbial growth/inactivation experiments were also conducted directly in/on the food product of interest [ 5 ].…”
Section: Historical Overview On the Inclusion Of Food Microstructure In Predictive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology was occasionally already applied in the 1980s and 1990s, but has been widely used in recent literature. An extensive list of example studies exploiting this approach is provided in Table 1 , both for microbial growth [ 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 ] and thermal inactivation [ 55 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 ], with a focus on early and recent examples. Interestingly, however, this predictive microbiology approach bears some similarities to the traditional challenge testing approach, in which microbial growth/inactivation experiments were also conducted directly in/on the food product of interest [ 5 ].…”
Section: Historical Overview On the Inclusion Of Food Microstructure In Predictive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…under conventional and novel thermal technologies are reviewed but only the primary model (the food-borne pathogen evolution as a function of heating time) is concerned [28]. However, since the inactivation kinetics are actually influenced by several factors, such as different bacterial strains, age of the culture, food composition (fat, NaCl, pH and a w ), processing parameters, and physiological state of the organisms, some researchers have established secondary models for predicting survival curves under different conditions [20,24,[29][30][31][32]. Also omnibus models incorporating the primary and the secondary models are further considered for predicting survival curves of pathogens [23,33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%