Modeling the Effects of Particle Shape on Damping Ratio of Dry Sand by Simple Shear Testing and Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of sand particle shape, in terms of roundness, sphericity and regularity, on the damping ratio of a dry sand material. Twelve different cyclic simple shear testing scenarios were considered and applied using vertical stresses of 50, 150 and 250 kPa and cyclic stress ratios (CSR) of 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 in both constant- and controlled-stress modes. Each testing scenario involved five tests, using the same sand that was reconstructed from its previous cyclic test. On completion of the cyclic tests, corresponding hysteresis loops were established to determine the damping ratio. The results indicated that the minimum and maximum damping ratios for this sand material were 6.9 and 25.5, respectively. It was observed that the shape of the sand particles changed during cyclic loading, becoming progressively more rounded and spherical with an increasing number of loading cycles, thereby resulting in an increase in the damping ratio. The second part of this investigation involved the development of artificial intelligence models, namely an artificial neural network (ANN) and a support vector machine (SVM), to predict the effects of sand particle shape on the damping ratio. The proposed ANN and SVM models were found to be effective in predicting the damping ratio as a function of the particle shape descriptors (i.e., roundness, sphericity and regularity), vertical stress, CSR and number of loading cycles. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the importance of the input variables; the vertical stress and regularity were, respectively, ranked as first and second in terms of importance, while the CSR was found to be the least important parameter.

Enhancing Ultimate Bearing Capacity Prediction of Cohesionless Soils Beneath Shallow Foundations with Grey Box and Hybrid AI Models

“…The realm of geotechnical engineering, while somewhat reserved in its adoption of AI, has begun to witness the application of AI-based techniques in addressing complex challenges. AI methods such as artificial neural networks (ANNs), fuzzy inference systems (FISs), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFISs), and others have shown remarkable potential in deciphering intricate relationships within complex datasets across diverse domains such as soil dynamics [15][16][17][18][19][20], deep foundations [21][22][23][24], soil cracking [25][26][27], recycled materials [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], soil mechanics [37,38], tunnelling and rock mechanics [39][40][41] and other fields [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. The beauty of these techniques lies in their capacity to capture nonlinear interactions between a myriad of variables, even when the underlying relationships are not fully understood.…”

Improving Soil Stability with Alum Sludge: An AI-Enabled Approach for Accurate Prediction of California Bearing Ratio

“…Using artificial intelligence techniques, it is possible to determine the relationship between different parameters with a high degree of accuracy, without prior knowledge. Various topics in geotechnical engineering, such as slope stability [25][26][27], tunneling [28][29][30], pavement and road construction [31,32], soil cracking [33][34][35], rock mechanics [36,37], soil dynamics [38][39][40][41], and soil stabilizers [42][43][44] have been addressed using artificial intelligence methods [45]. Nevertheless, only two studies have used artificial intelligence to predict the properties arising from mixing sludge with soil [46,47].…”

Predicting the strength of recycled glass powder-based geopolymers for improving mechanical behavior of clay soils using artificial intelligence

“…Based on AI methods, it is possible to predict the output with high accuracy without knowing the relationship between the parameters in advance [14]. In the last two decades, AI methods were used in geotechnical engineering applications include slope stability [15][16][17], tunnelling [18][19], road construction [20][21], and soil cracking [22][23], soil dynamics [24][25][26] and recycled material [27][28][29][30][31]. There has not yet been an article published on artificial intelligence methods for determining the strength of RGP and soil mixtures based on different input parameters.…”