2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40732-014-0108-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Effects of Melanoma Education on Visual Detection: A Gradient Shift Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Endorsement of other images was a positive function of their degree of similarity to S+, and mean generalization gradients were approximately symmetrical, with patterns of endorsement roughly similar for stimuli that were less and more symptomatic than S+. More symptomatic stimuli were slightly more likely than less symptomatic stimuli to be endorsed as Blike the original.^Such mildly asymmetrical gradients are common in stimulus generalization research (Ghirlanda & Enquist, 2003) and our previous studies involving melanoma images have yielded similar gradients (Dalianis et al, 2011;Miller et al, 2015).…”
Section: Questionnairesupporting
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Endorsement of other images was a positive function of their degree of similarity to S+, and mean generalization gradients were approximately symmetrical, with patterns of endorsement roughly similar for stimuli that were less and more symptomatic than S+. More symptomatic stimuli were slightly more likely than less symptomatic stimuli to be endorsed as Blike the original.^Such mildly asymmetrical gradients are common in stimulus generalization research (Ghirlanda & Enquist, 2003) and our previous studies involving melanoma images have yielded similar gradients (Dalianis et al, 2011;Miller et al, 2015).…”
Section: Questionnairesupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In this respect, gradients for cancer context participants bore similarity to those typically observed following discrimination training which contrasts an S+ stimulus in the moderate range of a stimulus dimension with an S− at one of the dimension's extremes (Ghirlanda & Enquist, 2003;Honig & Urcuioli, 1981). Recently, Miller et al (2015) replicated this gradient-shift effect with melanoma stimuli similar to those of the present study, and the results were very similar to those of the present cancer context groups, for which there was no experimentally programmed S−. Thus, many participants in the cancer context groups behaved as if responding to an S− that was not part of our procedure, at least not in the way that S− conventionally is defined (e.g., Dinsmoor, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations