2006
DOI: 10.1300/j097v12n02_03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Effects of Culture-Related Variables on the Attitude Towards Advertising

Abstract: The study investigates the differences in attitude towards advertising in general in different countries, based on the idea that advertising leverage (return on investment in advertising) for companies that are going global varies from culture to culture. The cultural variables underlying these differences are measured, using the Hofstede's (1980) methodology, and the theoretical and empirical relationship between these variables and the attitude towards advertising is explored. The sample is obtained from thr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across all these dimensions, the U.S. and Russia are located far from each. The attitude towards the advertising in general (Lutz, 1985), the theoretical and empirical link of which with individualism and masculinity in a culture was documented, also significantly differs for the two countries, making imagery advertising a more effective marketing tool in the U.S. than in Russia (Mikhailitchenko and Whipple, 2006).…”
Section: Cross-cultural Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across all these dimensions, the U.S. and Russia are located far from each. The attitude towards the advertising in general (Lutz, 1985), the theoretical and empirical link of which with individualism and masculinity in a culture was documented, also significantly differs for the two countries, making imagery advertising a more effective marketing tool in the U.S. than in Russia (Mikhailitchenko and Whipple, 2006).…”
Section: Cross-cultural Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A concurrent study of Russian advertising using the more limiting Bauer and Greyser model also confirmed global attitudinal orientations that were lower than the United States (Mikhailitchenko & Whipple, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The behavior (Lutz, 1985) towards advertising shows a difference in the two cultures. Imagery advertisement seems to be a more influential marketing tool in the U.S. than in Russia (Mikhailitchenko and Whipple, 2006). Interest in cross-cultural advertisement leads to many experimental studies which examine the similarities and differences in advertising content among different countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%