Abstract. Plants and their associated below-ground microbiota
possess the tools for rock weathering. Yet the quantitative evaluation of
the impact of these biogenic weathering drivers relative to abiogenic
parameters, such as the supply of primary minerals, water, and acids,
is an open question in Critical Zone research. Here we present a novel
strategy to decipher the relative impact of these drivers. We quantified the
degree and rate of weathering and compared these to nutrient uptake along
the “EarthShape” transect in the Chilean Coastal Cordillera. These sites
define a major north–south gradient in precipitation and primary
productivity but overlie granitoid rock throughout. We present a dataset of
the chemistry of Critical Zone compartments (bedrock, regolith, soil, and
vegetation) to quantify the relative loss of soluble elements (the “degree
of weathering”) and the inventory of bioavailable elements. We use
87Sr∕86Sr isotope ratios to identify the sources of mineral
nutrients to plants. With rates from cosmogenic nuclides and biomass growth
we determined fluxes (“weathering rates”), meaning the rate of loss of
elements out of the ecosystems, averaged over weathering timescales
(millennia), and quantified mineral nutrient recycling between the bulk
weathering zone and the bulk vegetation cover. We found that neither the
degree of weathering nor the weathering rates increase systematically with
precipitation from north to south along the climate and vegetation gradient.
Instead, the increase in biomass nutrient demand is accommodated by faster
nutrient recycling. In the absence of an increase in weathering rate despite
a five-fold increase in precipitation and net primary
productivity (NPP), we hypothesize that plant
growth might in fact dampen weathering rates. Because plants are thought to
be key players in the global silicate weathering–carbon feedback, this
hypothesis merits further evaluation.