2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(01)00047-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Bauschinger effect for sheet metals, part II: applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the difference in yield stress in tension and compression, is a well known subsequent deformation. This phenomenon must be considered for a precise modeling when forming sheet metals and considering subsequent springback predictions (Chun et al, 2002a, b;Yoshida et al, 2002a, b;Chung et al, 2005;Lee et al, 2005a, b). Mollica et al (2001) developed a general three dimensional model, which can reproduce the stress-strain response at loading reversals and can be applied to more general changes in loading direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the difference in yield stress in tension and compression, is a well known subsequent deformation. This phenomenon must be considered for a precise modeling when forming sheet metals and considering subsequent springback predictions (Chun et al, 2002a, b;Yoshida et al, 2002a, b;Chung et al, 2005;Lee et al, 2005a, b). Mollica et al (2001) developed a general three dimensional model, which can reproduce the stress-strain response at loading reversals and can be applied to more general changes in loading direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a constant blank holder force has to be applied to keep the gap constant: approximately 1.22 and 1.32 mm for the first and second stages, respectively. The friction coefficient is assumed to be uniform and constant for all contacting surfaces and equal to 0.168 [13,14]. The simulation may be performed in 2D because of its axial symmetry and a visco solid 106 element can be used for the sheet.…”
Section: Methods Of Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stress-strain responses during the transient period calculated by Yoshida-Uemori and the IH + NLK (isotropic hardening + nonlinear kinematic) models are different as can be seen in Figure 5 [12]. Chun modified the changes of stress level by isotropic hardening [13,14]. His model can predict the behavior of material better compared to the experimental results.…”
Section: Reverse Plasticity Modelsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The general approach to deal with damage in FEA is to define a parameter ω to characterize material degradation [6]. In the research on the accumulation of damage, a nonlinear damage model is used to definite the material degradation so that the history of stress can be taken into consideration.…”
Section: Theory Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%