2023
DOI: 10.1007/s42943-023-00070-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Barriers of a Circular Economy for Enhancing Competitiveness: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach

Abstract: This paper aims to identify the critical barriers to the circular economy (CE) within South African manufacturing companies and further model the barriers. A literature review was done to identify the barriers of CE in the context of South Africa and used as an input in the interpretive structural modeling (ISM) technique. This study discovered that the key challenges to CE adoption in the South African manufacturing industry are a lack of proper communication of the CE objectives, which dramatically impacts t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, defining the correct scope is not easy, as highlighted by Howard et al (2019). Furthermore, poor communication is a critical barrier, followed by a lack of top management support, which influences other variables such as a lack of environmental management systems, ultimately increasing environmental risks (Gift et al, 2023). When multiple actors are involved in a situation, it is common for them to have conflicting goals (Cavanagh et al, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, defining the correct scope is not easy, as highlighted by Howard et al (2019). Furthermore, poor communication is a critical barrier, followed by a lack of top management support, which influences other variables such as a lack of environmental management systems, ultimately increasing environmental risks (Gift et al, 2023). When multiple actors are involved in a situation, it is common for them to have conflicting goals (Cavanagh et al, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%