2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling temporal variation in recruitment in fisheries stock assessment: A review of theory and practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stige et al (2019) explored patterns of recruitment in six economically important marine fish populations and found that variation was size-and stage-specific, perhaps related to competition for limiting habitat. However, despite these and many similar studies, our understanding of factors affecting recruitment in wild fish populations is still considered poor (Maunder & Thorson, 2019), in part due to the simplifying assumptions we make when statistically analysing recruitment data (Dickey-Collas, Hintzen, Nash, Schön, & Payne, 2015). Our limited understanding of the factors causing variation in recruitment has hindered the development of fish stock assessment models and threatens to render them obsolete in the future (Subbey, Devine, Schaarschmidt, & Nash, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stige et al (2019) explored patterns of recruitment in six economically important marine fish populations and found that variation was size-and stage-specific, perhaps related to competition for limiting habitat. However, despite these and many similar studies, our understanding of factors affecting recruitment in wild fish populations is still considered poor (Maunder & Thorson, 2019), in part due to the simplifying assumptions we make when statistically analysing recruitment data (Dickey-Collas, Hintzen, Nash, Schön, & Payne, 2015). Our limited understanding of the factors causing variation in recruitment has hindered the development of fish stock assessment models and threatens to render them obsolete in the future (Subbey, Devine, Schaarschmidt, & Nash, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption was made because a previous study suggested that a shift in climatic conditions had changed spawning areas and stock abundances for both autumn‐spawning and winter‐spawning stocks (Sakurai et al, 2000). The changes in a i,y and b i,y both led to changes in productivity and were therefore likely to be confounded (Maunder & Thorson, 2019). The variation in a i,y changes both maximum recruits per spawner and maximum recruitment, and thus affects the expected recruitment at both high and low spawning abundances.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinguishing recruitment process and observation error is important for 89 accurately detecting regime shifts (King et al 2015;Maunder and Thorson 2019). such as abundance and fishing mortality as random effects have been developed and is 92 effective at separately estimating process and measurement errors (Nielsen and Berg 93 2014;Miller and Hyun 2017;Okamura et al 2018).…”
Section: Introduction 43mentioning
confidence: 99%