1975
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-021810-3.50006-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Techniques for Groundwater Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Walton and Prickett (1963), Prickett (1968). The names that come to mind are Tyson and Weber (1964) in Los Angeles, Zaoui (1961) at SogrØah and the Chott-el-Chergui in Algeria, Prickett (1975) for a review, and others.…”
Section: Heterogeneity and Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walton and Prickett (1963), Prickett (1968). The names that come to mind are Tyson and Weber (1964) in Los Angeles, Zaoui (1961) at SogrØah and the Chott-el-Chergui in Algeria, Prickett (1975) for a review, and others.…”
Section: Heterogeneity and Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A numerical ground-water flow model was used to simulate flow under existing permitted withdrawal rates (568,700 ft 3 /day or 150 Mgal/day) and to define time-of-travel protection zones (Prickett and Lonnquist, 1971;McKee, Inc., 1982, 1985). Time-of-travel well-field protection zones have been used to regulate land use and to limit activities that could adversely affect the ambient quality of ground water near the Northwest well field.…”
Section: Vulnerability-assessment Uncertainties In the Northwest Wellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numeric response models are presented by Freeze (1969), Neuman and Witherspoon (1971) and Prickett and Lonnquist (1971). Selected references on individual well design and construction methods are Johnson, Inc. (1966), Walton (1970) and Ahrens (1970).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One procedure for controlling time increments is to let the first be equal to, for example, 100 seconds, and succeeding time increments increase by the factor 1.2 (Prickett and Lonnquist, 1971).…”
Section: Mathematical Definition Of Aquifer Response Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%