2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-4822(99)00046-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Subordinate Perceptions of Sexual Harassment: The Role of Superior–Subordinate Social–Sexual Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed that is exactly the finding in much of the organizational literature Luthar, 2002, 2007;Luthar and Pastille, 2000). But how do we explain cases of sexual harassment of males if biology is the predominant factor?…”
Section: The Likelihood Of Women To Engage In Sexually Exploitative Amentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed that is exactly the finding in much of the organizational literature Luthar, 2002, 2007;Luthar and Pastille, 2000). But how do we explain cases of sexual harassment of males if biology is the predominant factor?…”
Section: The Likelihood Of Women To Engage In Sexually Exploitative Amentioning
confidence: 64%
“…It is a serious and a substantive issue for women in many ways. In terms of career development, sex discrimination and harassment have been documented to have a significant impact on advancement of women (Luthar and Pastille, 2000;MacKinnon, 1979). Of course, sexual harassment is not the only problem women face globally, but it is mostly a problem for women.…”
Section: Emphasis On the American Chinese And Indian Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apart from individuals and organisations, government equally bears the burden of sexual harassment. This happens in developed nations, where there are laws prohibiting sexual harassment in work settings Fitzgerald and Shullman, 1993;Luthar and Pastille, 2000;De Souza et al, 1998). Thus, the U S Merit System protection board (1994) reports that American government lost $327 million to sexual harassment between April 1992 and 1994.…”
Section: Implications Of Sexual Harassment In Work Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Causes of the relatively high prevalence rates in medical schools include the male‐dominated culture, with its hierarchical structure and conservative elements. Research has demonstrated that these factors facilitate the occurrence of sexual harassment 15–17 . Furthermore, medical students are at risk from 2 categories of offenders: patients, and medical doctors or colleagues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%