2012
DOI: 10.1029/2012jf002358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling sub‐sea permafrost in the East Siberian Arctic Shelf: The Laptev Sea region

Abstract: [1] Models of sub-sea permafrost evolution vary significantly in employed physical assumptions regarding the paleo-geographic scenario, geological structure, thermal properties, initial temperature distribution, and geothermal heat flux. This work aims to review the underlying assumptions of these models as well as to incorporate recent findings, and hence develop an up-to-date model of the sub-sea permafrost dynamics at the Laptev Sea shelf. In particular, the sub-sea permafrost model developed here incorpora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
97
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
97
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…sr.unh.edu/whatisarctichydro.shtml). Nicolsky et al, 2012). Moreover, the first results from offshore drilling (accomplished from the fast ice in April 2011) down to 52 m below the sea floor in the southeastern Laptev Sea showed that the sediment core was entirely unfrozen, and 8-12 • C warmer than an on-land sediment core obtained in the nearby Chay-Tumus borehole (Shakhova et al, 2014), confirming these authors' modeling results.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…sr.unh.edu/whatisarctichydro.shtml). Nicolsky et al, 2012). Moreover, the first results from offshore drilling (accomplished from the fast ice in April 2011) down to 52 m below the sea floor in the southeastern Laptev Sea showed that the sediment core was entirely unfrozen, and 8-12 • C warmer than an on-land sediment core obtained in the nearby Chay-Tumus borehole (Shakhova et al, 2014), confirming these authors' modeling results.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The absence of glacial ice during the LGM is consistent with the existence of permafrost across much of the submarine East Siberian shelf (Romanovskii et al, 2004;Nicolsky et al, 2012), the reported absence of ice on Wrangel island during the LGM (Gaultieri et al, 2005) and the comparatively limited extent of the Kara ice sheet on the Barents Sea (Möller et al, 2015). The lack of glacial ice in the East Siberian Sea and the Kara Sea during the LGM are both ascribed to generally arid conditions due to a reduction in atmospheric moisture supply to these regions (Gaultieri et al, 2005;Möller et al, 2015).…”
Section: Timing and Association With Ice Sheets On The Siberian Shelfmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…3). In this area IB-CAO is completely based on digitized contours from the Russian bathymetric maps published by the Head Department of Navigation and Oceanography (HDNO) in 1999 and 2001 (Naryshkin, 1999(Naryshkin, , 2001. The source data of the Russian HDNO maps are not publicly available.…”
Section: Cross-shelf Troughmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at 74.5 • N, 118 • E, for example, the depth of permafrost saturated to at least 50 % by ice degrades from about 25 to 200 m b.s.f. (below the sea floor), a mean rate of just below 0.01 m a −1 (Nicolsky et al, 2012). Romanovskii and Hubberten (2001) show even lower rates of degradation of icebonded permafrost (defined as liquid water contents of < 5 % by weight).…”
Section: Submarine Permafrost Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following inundation, ice content decreases throughout submarine permafrost due to warming and the consequent thaw of pore ice. Nicolsky et al (2012) shows this as an increase in water content based on assumed freezing characteristic curves. In this model, the rate of ice melt depends on a suite of conditions during and antecedent to inundation.…”
Section: Submarine Permafrost Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%