Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN/SIGBED 2010 Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1755888.1755895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling structured event streams in system level performance analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also defines update functions for the modification of jitter and minimum distance of the inner event streams of an HES. Similarly, Structured Event Streams, which are characterized by so-called Event Count Curves, were introduced in Perathoner et al (2010) and compared against HES.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It also defines update functions for the modification of jitter and minimum distance of the inner event streams of an HES. Similarly, Structured Event Streams, which are characterized by so-called Event Count Curves, were introduced in Perathoner et al (2010) and compared against HES.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to distribute a single activation from the RX task, which (in a multiplexing scenario) typically contains several CAN frames, to the TX tasks, a (demultiplexing) fork is required. As this fork, in contrast to the standard fork, which forwards all incoming event models to all dependent tasks, selectively distributes event models depending on the receiving task, we model the demultiplexing fork explicitly as in Perathoner et al (2010). There is no sampling delay on the egress gateway.…”
Section: Cpa Gateway Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [15], [13] the case where streams are transported over a network as a single, joined stream, to be separated at arrival, is treated by tracking the correlations between sub-streams and the aggregated stream. The event count curves of [13] are a special case of our drift bounds: a bound on a sub-stream with respect to the aggregate stream.…”
Section: B Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The event count curves of [13] are a special case of our drift bounds: a bound on a sub-stream with respect to the aggregate stream.…”
Section: B Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%