2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-28909-6_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Streaming Potential in Porous and Fractured Media, Description and Benefits of the Effective Excess Charge Density Approach

Abstract: Self-potential signals can be generated by different sources and can be decomposed in various contributions. Streaming potential is the contribution due to the water flux in the subsurface and is of particular interest in hydrogeophysics and reservoir characterization. Being able to estimate water fluxes in porous and fractured media using streaming potential data relies on our understanding of the electrokinetic coupling at the mineral-solution interface and our capacity to understand, model, and upscale it. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach neglects electrical surface conductivity on the mineral surface, nevertheless alternative formulas have been proposed by several researchers in order to account this effect (e.g., Morgan et al, 1989;Revil et al, 1999;Glover and Déry, 2010). On the other side, the second approach is more recent and focuses on the excess charge that is effectively dragged by the water flux in the pore space (e.g., Kormiltsev et al, 1998;Revil et al, 2007;Jougnot et al, 2012;Revil, 2017;Guarracino and Jougnot, 2018;Jougnot et al, 2020). In this approach, the streaming current can be expressed as the product between the effective excess charge density and the water flux velocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach neglects electrical surface conductivity on the mineral surface, nevertheless alternative formulas have been proposed by several researchers in order to account this effect (e.g., Morgan et al, 1989;Revil et al, 1999;Glover and Déry, 2010). On the other side, the second approach is more recent and focuses on the excess charge that is effectively dragged by the water flux in the pore space (e.g., Kormiltsev et al, 1998;Revil et al, 2007;Jougnot et al, 2012;Revil, 2017;Guarracino and Jougnot, 2018;Jougnot et al, 2020). In this approach, the streaming current can be expressed as the product between the effective excess charge density and the water flux velocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Σ s (S) the specific surface conductance and Λ (m) is a characteristic length scale [64]. Addition to the HS equation or modified HS equation, the SPCC can be expressed via the effective excess charge density dragged by pore water in porous media as [e.g., [42][43][44]…”
Section: Theory Of the Electrokinetic Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(37) and Eq. (44), the relationship between the streaming potential coupling coefficient and effective charge density is obtained as…”
Section: Effective Excess Charge Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can also exclude that surface meltwater was generated throughout the whole season, given that we only expect significant meltwater in winter due to strong surface radiation caused by direct sunlight, which is often not present in case of cloud covers and limited on the north-facing slope of the Schilthorn. Blake and Clarke (1999) and Kulessa et al (2003) suggested electrochemical and streaming potentials as possible causes for diurnal variation. However, their potential measurements were explained with variations in electrical fluid conductivity and water pressure caused by periodic pressure and meltwater flows in a summertime glacier.…”
Section: Spectral Power Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrical signature changes were associated with changes in the water level of adjacent reservoir lakes, which in turn were related to vertical water movement in the soil. Kulessa et al (2003) present results from multi-year borehole SP measurements in a glacier, successfully relating electrical signals to water flow direction and velocity and investigating the separation of geochemically and hydraulically generated electrical signals. Other notable long-term monitoring studies include volcanic research, in which natural electrical signals are investigated as precursor signals to seismic activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%