Modeling somatic computation with non-neural bioelectric networks

Abstract

The field of basal cognition seeks to understand how adaptive, context-specific behavior occurs in non-neural biological systems. Embryogenesis and regeneration require plasticity in many tissue types to achieve structural and functional goals in diverse circumstances. Thus, advances in both evolutionary cell biology and regenerative medicine require an understanding of how non-neural tissues could process information. Neurons evolved from ancient cell types that used bioelectric signaling to perform computation. However, it has not been shown whether or how non-neural bioelectric cell networks can support computation. We generalize connectionist methods to non-neural tissue architectures, showing that a minimal non-neural Bio-Electric Network (BEN) model that utilizes the general principles of bioelectricity (electrodiffusion and gating) can compute. We characterize BEN behaviors ranging from elementary logic gates to pattern detectors, using both fixed and transient inputs to recapitulate various biological scenarios. We characterize the mechanisms of such networks using dynamical-systems and information-theory tools, demonstrating that logic can manifest in bidirectional, continuous, and relatively slow bioelectrical systems, complementing conventional neural-centric architectures. Our results reveal a variety of non-neural decision-making processes as manifestations of general cellular biophysical mechanisms and suggest novel bioengineering approaches to construct functional tissues for regenerative medicine and synthetic biology as well as new machine learning architectures.

Cancer Niches and Their Kikuchi Free Energy

“…In these processes, the spatial aspects are as important as the temporal ones, and steady system states are found when the free energy of spatiotemporal dynamics reach minima. In this context, the geometry of the cell’s population presents a role that goes beyond the mere effect on mechanics forces [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ].…”

Gene regulatory networks exhibit several kinds of memory: Quantification of memory in biological and random transcriptional networks

“…Gradually, the dog learns to associate the NS with the UCS, to the point where it responds to the bell alone as if food is present, functionally transforming the NS to a conditioned stimulus (CS), which can now produce the response R ( Figure 1 C). Although associative learning is traditionally studied as a neural phenomenon, many different types of dynamical systems can instantiate it ( Baluška and Levin, 2016 ; Fernando et al., 2009 ; Manicka and Levin, 2019a , 2019b ; McGregor et al., 2012 ) ( Figure 1 D). Indeed, the original experiments of Pavlov showed associative and other kinds of learning within his dogs' organ systems ( Gantt, 1974 , 1981 ), in addition to the well-known learning of the animal via its brain.…”

Immunoceptive inference: why are psychiatric disorders and immune responses intertwined?

“…spatiotemporal scale) above (Kirchhoff 2018;Kirchhoff et al 2018;Ramstead et al 2018;Hesp et al 2019;Ramstead et al 2019;Palacios et al 2020)-a necessary facet of 'belonging to something greater'. On a general note, this thesis rejects dualism in the same spirit of recent proposals-from molecular biology (Kuchling et al 2019;Manicka and Levin 2019) to evolution (Ao 2005;Frank 2012;Campbell 2016;Ramirez and Marshall 2017)-that put inference, beliefs 1 and purpose into biological processes.…”