2018
DOI: 10.1117/1.jrs.12.042803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling soil organic matter and texture from satellite data in areas affected by wildfires and cropland abandonment in Aragón, Northern Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among modelled properties, SOM calibrations showed the highest predictive capability accounting on average for 86% (CCR‐SD) and 82% (PLSR‐full and PLSR‐MUT) of the variance in the calibration and 87% (PLSR‐full and CCR‐SD) and 79% (PLSR‐MUT) in the validation data sets. The CCR‐SD and PLSR‐full models for SOM developed in this study are more accurate ( R 2 0.05–0.07 higher and the average RPIQ above 3) than the SOM models we built previously for soil samples from wildfire burns from the same area using PLSR with the step‐down variable selection algorithm (Rosero‐Vlasova, Vlassova, Pérez‐Cabello, Montorio, & Nadal‐Romero, ), which is probably due to the different modelling algorithm and larger calibration data set used in this study. The superior RPIQ of the SOM models (~3 or above) developed with CCR‐SD and PLSR‐full is another indicator of their high quality.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Among modelled properties, SOM calibrations showed the highest predictive capability accounting on average for 86% (CCR‐SD) and 82% (PLSR‐full and PLSR‐MUT) of the variance in the calibration and 87% (PLSR‐full and CCR‐SD) and 79% (PLSR‐MUT) in the validation data sets. The CCR‐SD and PLSR‐full models for SOM developed in this study are more accurate ( R 2 0.05–0.07 higher and the average RPIQ above 3) than the SOM models we built previously for soil samples from wildfire burns from the same area using PLSR with the step‐down variable selection algorithm (Rosero‐Vlasova, Vlassova, Pérez‐Cabello, Montorio, & Nadal‐Romero, ), which is probably due to the different modelling algorithm and larger calibration data set used in this study. The superior RPIQ of the SOM models (~3 or above) developed with CCR‐SD and PLSR‐full is another indicator of their high quality.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Unlike high-resolution topographic information, the availability of spatial layers of soil conditions is still limited (Fang et al, 2016). Yet, spaceborne multispectral and imaging spectroscopy instruments have a high potential for mapping topsoil carbon (Peón et al, 2017) and organic matter content as well as soil physical properties (Rosero-Vlasova et al, 2018). These novel possibilities should be tested in SDMs in the future.…”
Section: Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SOC prediction models were found to be overall better when formulated using the visible B4, B5, near infrared B8A, and two SWIR bands (B11, B12) [67]. Furthermore, cropland soil degradation with classification methods have also been studied [68,69].…”
Section: Sentinel-2 For Precision Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%