2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Social Life Cycle Assessment framework for the Italian wine sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this challenge, different tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability like LCA (for example, [85,88]) or footprints methodologies (for instance, [101]) have been developed. In an international context, two of the most accepted methodologies are the Organizational Environmental Footprint from the European Commission, which measures the environmental impacts, and the UNEP/SETAC methodology, which measures social impacts [88,89].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this challenge, different tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability like LCA (for example, [85,88]) or footprints methodologies (for instance, [101]) have been developed. In an international context, two of the most accepted methodologies are the Organizational Environmental Footprint from the European Commission, which measures the environmental impacts, and the UNEP/SETAC methodology, which measures social impacts [88,89].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chain/VCAs governance and relations between VCA From the Guidelines Fair competition [28,[46][47][48], C1…”
Section: Subcategories/criteria Studies Using Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bulk of the available studies focused on the environmental aspects, as data is easier to obtain, and quantification methodologies are more developed, although some studies have also considered economic and even social aspects of sustainability [26,27]. Other studies considered only specific indicators, especially the carbon footprint (CF) and the water footprints (WF) [28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%