2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling slender bodies with the method of regularized Stokeslets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this blob parameter, we discretize each helix into 120 points. It has been shown that when using the method of regularized Stokeslets, a good choice for the discretization is one where the spacing between points is on the order of the size of the blob parameter [3,5,10]. The plot of the blob function with our chosen parameter is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Helical Flagellummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this blob parameter, we discretize each helix into 120 points. It has been shown that when using the method of regularized Stokeslets, a good choice for the discretization is one where the spacing between points is on the order of the size of the blob parameter [3,5,10]. The plot of the blob function with our chosen parameter is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Helical Flagellummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce computational costs, we do not explicitly discretize the surfaces of the helices. Instead, we place ns -130 regularized Stokeslets along each of the helix centerlines and tune the regularization parameter e to account for the finite filament radius [33]. We find that £ = 0.5L /n s reproduces the behavior for a = R / 16 with high accuracy.…”
Section: A Geometrymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Technical details on how SBT may be applied to a slender spheroid, as well as the choice of spreading parameter to minimize errors, have also been given (Bouzarth and Minion 2011). Here, we give our attention to papers which made comparisons between their analytical or numerical results with experimental observations.…”
Section: Slender Body Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation by Autrusson et al (2011) using SBT also allows the elastic modulus of biofilm streamers to be computed accurately Page 7 of 27 98 within the measured range (Aravas and Laspidou 2008). It was found that the presence of error arising from the use of SBT can in general be attributed primarily to the fact that Stokeslets are used instead of a collection of singularities, and that imposing centerline boundary conditions correspond to better accuracy when analyzing a slender spheroid (Bouzarth and Minion 2011). SBT can be used not only for micro-sized particles and cells in microfluidics, but also for large but slender-bodied objects such as ships.…”
Section: Slender Body Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%