2010
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201000123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Sieving Filtration using Multiple Layers of Parallel Pores

Abstract: Experimental retention data with several membrane filters show that the filtration efficiency decreases considerably over time, which appears to be inconsistent with a size exclusion retention mechanism. Several model descriptions of the porous structure are considered to describe this behavior. Simulation results with a sieving mechanism are compared to experimental data and the influence of input parameters are investigated. Fairly simple models may be used to qualitatively describe the retention behavior. M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The density clusters identified on the SEM images of PVDF membranes by density-based spatial clustering of application with noise (DBSCAN) are shown in Figure 10b. The particle deposition patterns, which were reported in previous studies obtained through experimental and mathematical conventional approaches [5,8,12,15,30], were also recognized in these figures. Namely, at a low feed water concentration of 2 mg/L, the exclusion and attachment mechanisms seemed to be prevalent, with particles rejected by the same or smaller sized pores and particles attached on the membrane surfaces forming scattered small aggregates (Figure 10a,b far left).…”
Section: Particle Deposition Patterns On Real and Generated Imagessupporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The density clusters identified on the SEM images of PVDF membranes by density-based spatial clustering of application with noise (DBSCAN) are shown in Figure 10b. The particle deposition patterns, which were reported in previous studies obtained through experimental and mathematical conventional approaches [5,8,12,15,30], were also recognized in these figures. Namely, at a low feed water concentration of 2 mg/L, the exclusion and attachment mechanisms seemed to be prevalent, with particles rejected by the same or smaller sized pores and particles attached on the membrane surfaces forming scattered small aggregates (Figure 10a,b far left).…”
Section: Particle Deposition Patterns On Real and Generated Imagessupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Such a phenomenon was reported in stochastic-based modeling studies [15], mainly through the flux variation approach, rather than variations of feed particle concentrations. This observation could be further investigated through image analysis of the membranes deposited with particles at different initial feed water concentrations of 0, 2, 5, and 8 mg/L (Figure 10a,b).…”
Section: Particle Deposition Patterns On Real and Generated Imagesmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Duclos‐Orsello et al modeled a microfiltration membrane by considering both internal and external fouling. Beuscher developed a simplified 2D series of independent layers with a pore‐size distribution in each layer as a structure of the membrane to study the retention behavior. In this study, the probability of a particle being captured in a pore smaller than the particle size itself was only dependent on the fraction of pores that were smaller than the particle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%