2006
DOI: 10.1117/12.652105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling shape variability for full heart segmentation in cardiac computed-tomography images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
28
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of patients is significantly larger than those reported in the literature, for example, 10 in Schramm et al, 22 13 in Ecabert et al, 23 and 18 in Jolly. 17 The imaging protocols are heterogeneous with different capture ranges and resolutions.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The number of patients is significantly larger than those reported in the literature, for example, 10 in Schramm et al, 22 13 in Ecabert et al, 23 and 18 in Jolly. 17 The imaging protocols are heterogeneous with different capture ranges and resolutions.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The cardiac motion model was trained on additional 20 sequences (each with 10 frames). Our dataset is much larger than those reported in the literature, e.g., 13 in [38], 18 in [5], 27 in [39], and 30 in [40].…”
Section: Four Chambers Tracking Of the Heartcontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Most of the previous approaches focus on boundary delineation based on active shape models (ASM), 5 active appearance models (AAM), 6,7 and deformable models. 3,[8][9][10][11][12] There are a few limitations inherent in these techniques: 1) Most of them are semi-automatic and manual labeling of a rough position and pose of the heart chambers is needed. 2) They are likely to get stuck in local strong image evidence.…”
Section: Related Work On Heart Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%