Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1772690.1772790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling relationship strength in online social networks

Abstract: Previous work analyzing social networks has mainly focused on binary friendship relations. However, in online social networks the low cost of link formation can lead to networks with heterogeneous relationship strengths (e.g., acquaintances and best friends mixed together). In this case, the binary friendship indicator provides only a coarse representation of relationship information. In this work, we develop an unsupervised model to estimate relationship strength from interaction activity (e.g., communication… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
339
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 539 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
339
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, users' personal characteristics such as age, gender, and cuisine preferences were used in [21], and social affinity was considered in [22,23]. User's history of online activity can also be collected, for example, search history; history of map browsing and spatial searching logs [24][25][26], place reviews and ratings [27][28][29], as well as explicit interaction on LBSN, by tagging and commenting on places [30,31]. In this work, users' location tracks are considered as the primary source of user-place relationships, as these represent explicit interaction with geographic places, normally recording actual visits to places.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, users' personal characteristics such as age, gender, and cuisine preferences were used in [21], and social affinity was considered in [22,23]. User's history of online activity can also be collected, for example, search history; history of map browsing and spatial searching logs [24][25][26], place reviews and ratings [27][28][29], as well as explicit interaction on LBSN, by tagging and commenting on places [30,31]. In this work, users' location tracks are considered as the primary source of user-place relationships, as these represent explicit interaction with geographic places, normally recording actual visits to places.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two works use a supervised learning model that needs human intervention to work properly. Aiming at the same objective, Xiang et al [29] proposed a model to infer relationship strength based on profile similarity and interaction activity, with the goal of automatically distinguishing strong relationships from weak ones. It is worth noting that this model relies on an unsupervised learning method, but it lacks a empirical evaluation with real users.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, weak ties may refer to coworkers or less trusted friends. More recent works have proposed models to predict tie strength in SNSs [8,13,29]. These works showed that it is possible to infer tie strength from the available personal data in a SNS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] studied the topological properties of the social network formed by Twitter users. And, [6] analyzed the relationship strength in the social network of Facebook and LinkedIn. Beyond link structure, [2] studied how to identify influential users in Twitter.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%