2019
DOI: 10.1104/pp.19.00086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Protein Destiny in Developing Fruit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(85 reference statements)
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with previous phenotyping and modelling studies on tomato that demonstrate metabolic shifts in carbon metabolism in the growing fruit [25,28,29,31]. Furthermore, it has been recently confirmed through transcriptomics and proteomics that the developing fruit not only undergoes metabolic shifts in central pathways, but also redox metabolism, such as for pyridine nucleotides that are detrimental to energy homeostasis [27,32,33]. However, major questions remain regarding the nature and dynamics of shifts in central metabolism upon pathogen inoculation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This agrees with previous phenotyping and modelling studies on tomato that demonstrate metabolic shifts in carbon metabolism in the growing fruit [25,28,29,31]. Furthermore, it has been recently confirmed through transcriptomics and proteomics that the developing fruit not only undergoes metabolic shifts in central pathways, but also redox metabolism, such as for pyridine nucleotides that are detrimental to energy homeostasis [27,32,33]. However, major questions remain regarding the nature and dynamics of shifts in central metabolism upon pathogen inoculation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…PCA explained 83% of the maximal variance in the dataset and resulted in a separation of fruit by developmental characteristics (i.e., the first and second fruit versus the third fruit) rather than by pathosystems ( Figure 3B). Hence, this multivariate differentiation indicates that the profiles of primary metabolites mostly respond to the developmental stage of the fruit, which supports the idea that central metabolism is tuned to fruit growth [27][28][29]. Complementarily, two-factor ANOVA (P < 0.05) only generated significant markers for the inoculation factor (4; 36%), including sucrose, fructose, glutamate and fumarate (Table 1 and Figure S1).…”
Section: Global Metabolomics After Baba Treatment and After Inoculationsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…These observations can be caused by paralog exchanges or by PTMs. Paralog exchanges are likely considering independent reports showing that paired transcript translation and protein degradation rates of cytosolic-RPs from tomato Solanum lycopersicum are high ( Belouah et al., 2019 ) and cytosolic RPs of Arabidopsis have a high standard deviation of the protein degradation rates ( Li et al., 2017a ). These studies suggest that a potential mechanism of ribosome remodeling exists even though RPs are in general stable and long-lived ( Li et al., 2017a ).…”
Section: Protein Composition Of the Cytosolic Ribosomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is performed by integrating transcriptomics and proteomics data sets of nine tomato developmental stages using ordinary differential equations (ODE) to obtain rate constants for translation (k t ) and degradation (k d ). The result suggests that the equation reliably predicts the expression of nearly 50% of 2,400 transcript-protein pairs from the study and that the protein level was regulated strongly by the translation rate rather than degradation (Belouah et al, 2019).…”
Section: Differential Analysismentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Differential analysis has been applied to various plant and fruit studies ( Koç et al., 2018 ; Wang et al., 2018 ; Belouah et al., 2019 ) and can be divided into either non-targeted or targeted pathway studies. One recent example of the former (non-targeted pathway) approach is the development of differential equation for protein density during tomato ripening ( Belouah et al., 2019 ). This is performed by integrating transcriptomics and proteomics data sets of nine tomato developmental stages using ordinary differential equations (ODE) to obtain rate constants for translation ( k t ) and degradation ( k d ).…”
Section: Level 3 Moi: Mathematical-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%