2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40948-021-00248-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling pressurized fracture propagation with the isogeometric BEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is a typical semi-infinite domain external sound field problem, and it is difficult to numerically simulate the performance of the noise barrier by the FEM. As we all know, the boundary element method (BEM) is superior to the FEM when solving sound field problems in infinite/semi-infinite domains because of its advantages such as high accuracy and automatic mesh generation [25][26][27][28]. However, as the amount of computation increases, the process of meshing will consume a lot of costs, which makes the transition process from CAD to CAE very cumbersome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is a typical semi-infinite domain external sound field problem, and it is difficult to numerically simulate the performance of the noise barrier by the FEM. As we all know, the boundary element method (BEM) is superior to the FEM when solving sound field problems in infinite/semi-infinite domains because of its advantages such as high accuracy and automatic mesh generation [25][26][27][28]. However, as the amount of computation increases, the process of meshing will consume a lot of costs, which makes the transition process from CAD to CAE very cumbersome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because both the BEM and CAD are based on boundary representation [5][6][7], they are naturally compatible with each other. IGA in the context of the boundary element method (IGABEM) has been successfully applied to a wide range of areas, including potential problems [8], linear elasticity [9,10], fracture mechanics [11][12][13][14], structural optimization [15][16][17][18], acoustics [19][20][21][22][23][24][25], and heat conduction [26,27], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nie et al [34][35][36][37][38] studied the noniterative inversion of heat flow boundary conditions and thermal stress estimation of gradient materials based on the refined integration finite element method. Chen et al [39][40][41][42][43] studied the heat conduction analysis of two-dimensional and threedimensional geometric boundary element methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%