2004
DOI: 10.1525/mp.2004.21.4.561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Perceived Emotion With Continuous Musical Features

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

21
261
3
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(298 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
21
261
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to the time lag between tension ratings and corresponding musical events, our results are consistent with observations by Schubert (2004), who reported emotion responses 1 to 3 seconds after the respective musical event. Interestingly, the time lag was shorter for the Mozart than for the Mendelssohn piece, which raises the question as to how properties of the music influence the response times of participants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…With respect to the time lag between tension ratings and corresponding musical events, our results are consistent with observations by Schubert (2004), who reported emotion responses 1 to 3 seconds after the respective musical event. Interestingly, the time lag was shorter for the Mozart than for the Mendelssohn piece, which raises the question as to how properties of the music influence the response times of participants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This question has attracted research with a focus on acoustic/perceptual features that include: sound intensity/loudness (Chapin, Large, Jantzen, Kelso, & Steinberg, 2008;Olsen, Stevens, & Tardieu, 2007); frequency/pitch and tonality (Kessler, Hansen, & Shepard, 1984;Windsor, 1997); sound duration/meter and tempo (Boltz, 1998;Chapin, et al, 2008;Quinn & Watt, 2006;Todd, Cousins, & Lee, 2007;Vuust, Ostergaard, Pallesen, Bailey, & Roepstorff, 2009); and spectrum/timbre (Bailes & Dean, 2007;Caclin, McAdams, Smith, & Winsberg, 2005;Gordon & Grey, 1978), as these relate to perceived structure and emotional response (Bailes & Dean, 2009;Bigand, Vieillard, Madurell, Marozeau, & Dacquet, 2005;Dubnov, McAdams, & Reynolds, 2006;Gabrielsson & Lindstrom, 2001;Leman, Vermeulen, De Voogdt, Moelants, & Lesaffre, 2005;Schubert, 2004;Sloboda, 1991;Sloboda & Lehmann, 2001). An issue in this work is the inadequacy of treating music as a static entity, since perception is determined by the temporal organization of these acoustic properties (Brittin & Duke, 1997;Deliège, Mélen, Stammers, & Cross, 1996;Krumhansl & Kessler, 1982;Lalitte & Bigand, 2006;McAdams, Vines, Vieillard, Smith, & Reynolds, 2004;Schubert, 2004;Sloboda & Lehmann, 2001). This paper will detail an analytical method allowing for just such a dynamic examination of the relationship between acoustical properties of a composition with real-time listener perceptions of its structure and its affective content.…”
Section: Abstract: Perception Affect Acoustics Autoregressive Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schubert, 2004). Missing are substantial attempts to assess which acoustic properties also drive listeners' perceptions of the structure of the same music.…”
Section: Abstract: Perception Affect Acoustics Autoregressive Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations