2010
DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0b013e3181c15619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Pancreatic Cancer In Vivo

Abstract: In the last 10 years, there has been a relative explosion of new rodent systems that recapitulate both genetic and cellular lesions that lead to the development of pancreatic cancer. These models now need to be considered when selecting an appropriate in vivo system to study disease etiology, cell signaling, and drug development. The majority of these evaluations have used transplantation of cancer cells and the use of carcinogens, which still maintain their value when investigating human cancer and epigenetic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Molecular pathobiology has provided a compendium of genetic lesions, often implicating aberrant molecular changes at genetic, transcriptomic, epigenetic, and proteomic levels that correlate with histological progression from normal to non-invasive precursor to invasive carcinoma 7781 . This has led to the development of several complex genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) of pancreatic cancer that recapitulate key aspects of human pancreatic cancer development, including the development of precursor lesions in the pancreatic ducts.…”
Section: Session 3: Agents and Pathways That Could Be Targeted In A Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Molecular pathobiology has provided a compendium of genetic lesions, often implicating aberrant molecular changes at genetic, transcriptomic, epigenetic, and proteomic levels that correlate with histological progression from normal to non-invasive precursor to invasive carcinoma 7781 . This has led to the development of several complex genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) of pancreatic cancer that recapitulate key aspects of human pancreatic cancer development, including the development of precursor lesions in the pancreatic ducts.…”
Section: Session 3: Agents and Pathways That Could Be Targeted In A Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newer models such as the ELA-CreERT/CAG-lox- KRAS G12v , Mist1- KRAS , and LSL- KRAS G12D/p /DPC4 flox/p mice have been engineered that mimic human IPMN and MCN 85,86 . Thus, pancreatic GEMMs represent all the morphological spectrum of pancreatic cancer precursor lesions, as well as the histopathology of precursor lesion progression and its association with inflammation and desmoplasia 77,81,86,87 .…”
Section: Session 3: Agents and Pathways That Could Be Targeted In A Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The generation of these models essentially involves targeting a variety of genes to a range of cell targets (including ductal cells and acinar cells) in the pancreas to produce an array of neoplastic changes. 6 Animals expressing mutant Kras in the pancreas develop a spectrum of preneoplastic changes in the form of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. 7 Targeting additional somatic alterations including inactivation of p16/CDKN2A, 8 TP53, 9 and transforming growth factor- β pathway components such as DPC4/SMAD4 10 in the background of mutant Kras leads to the development of tumors that recapitulate the full spectrum of pancreatic tumor development including invasive cancer, locoregional spread, and metastatic disease.…”
Section: Animal Models In Pancreatic Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are now available to investigate the basic and translational aspects of this malignancy (4, 5). Models of neoplasms such as murine pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (mPanIN), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (mIPMN), and mucinous cystic neoplasia (mMCN) have all been described (though mIPMN and mMCN should be further characterized for a more-complete validation).…”
Section: Mouse Models Of Pancreatic Cancer For Potential Chemopreventmentioning
confidence: 99%