2017 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/i2cacis.2017.8239036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of vehicle trajectory clustering based on LCSS for traffic pattern extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in this paper, we improved the Itakura parallelogram to further improve the efficiency and accuracy of the DTW algorithm. As mentioned in Bergroth and colleagues, [19][20][21] the traditional LCSS algorithm is not applicable to most situations due to the condition that the elements must be consistent, so we used a threshold range for the constraint. From Su and others, 10,11,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28] it can be seen that most researchers, when studying the similarity of trajectories, only consider the distance between trajectories as a feature alone, which may reduce the accuracy of calculating the similarity and is also easily affected by the different degrees of dispersion of trajectory points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in this paper, we improved the Itakura parallelogram to further improve the efficiency and accuracy of the DTW algorithm. As mentioned in Bergroth and colleagues, [19][20][21] the traditional LCSS algorithm is not applicable to most situations due to the condition that the elements must be consistent, so we used a threshold range for the constraint. From Su and others, 10,11,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28] it can be seen that most researchers, when studying the similarity of trajectories, only consider the distance between trajectories as a feature alone, which may reduce the accuracy of calculating the similarity and is also easily affected by the different degrees of dispersion of trajectory points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these parameters are difficult to generalize in different scenarios and can only describe the similarity at a specific state rather than over the whole driving process. There are also methods to evaluate the consistency of the behavior of two segments by evaluating the similarity of their trajectories, such as longest common subsequence [29] and dynamic time warping [30], but these only consider the similarity of trajectories and not the velocity state at the corresponding position, with insufficient consideration of driving information. For quantitative comparison of consistency during the whole driving process, containing both track and vehicle information, the trajectory field is used to describe the vehicle motivation state and evaluate the similarity of the human and ADS driving trajectory fields by probability analysis.…”
Section: Anthropomorphic Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The representative of density analysis is Kernel Density Estimation (KDE), which is a nonparametric method that generates a smooth density surface to analyze the spatial distribution characteristics of the data [12]. Many types of spatial clustering algorithms are widely used in vehicle trajectory [13,14]. In the long-term development process, many classification systems have been formed based on different ideas, such as hierarchical and partitioning methods [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%