1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(97)00177-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of ultrafiltration process for a two-component aqueous solution of low and high (gel-forming) molecular weight solutes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to resistance-in-series models, the flux decline is due to the combined effects of (i) fouling of the membrane (reversible and/or irreversible pore blocking) [15,16] and (ii) concentration polarization over the membrane surface [17][18][19]. But in gel polarization models the decrease in flux is due to the hydraulic resistance of the deposited gel layer over the membrane surface [20,21]. On the other hand, in osmotic-pressure-controlled models, flux decline is due to the decrease in effective transmembrane pressure drop which occurs as the osmotic pressure of the retained solution increases [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to resistance-in-series models, the flux decline is due to the combined effects of (i) fouling of the membrane (reversible and/or irreversible pore blocking) [15,16] and (ii) concentration polarization over the membrane surface [17][18][19]. But in gel polarization models the decrease in flux is due to the hydraulic resistance of the deposited gel layer over the membrane surface [20,21]. On the other hand, in osmotic-pressure-controlled models, flux decline is due to the decrease in effective transmembrane pressure drop which occurs as the osmotic pressure of the retained solution increases [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By considering one dimensional mass transfer within the boundary layer (0 oy oδ) the following equation is obtained for the transient growth of cake layer (De and Bhattacharya, 1997;Hong et al, 1997):…”
Section: Transient Growth Of Cake Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that, the porosity values in literature lie between 0.34 (for random close packing of hard spheres) and 0.74 (for smaller particles in a very dilute electrolyte) (Faibish et al, 1998). Most researchers evaluated porosity ∼40 (almost random close packing) for their particular condition (∼100 nm silica particles and 10 mM KCl solution for a wide range of pressure, flow rate and pH) (De and Bhattacharya, 1997;Faibish et al, 1998;Hoek and Elimelech, 2003;Hong et al, 1997). The porosity values in this study (48)(49)(50)(51)(52) are in good agreement with literature data considering our different condition (NaCl solution at pH 7).…”
Section: Effect Of Operating Parameters On Fouling Of Nf Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports are available for the treatment of leather plant effluent using membrane-based processes [3,5,6]. Various flux decline mechanisms are proposed in the literature, e.g., osmotic pressure governed flux decline [13,14], gel or cake layer controlled flux decline [15,16], various steps for blocking the membrane pores, like, complete pore blocking, standard pore blocking, intermediate pore blocking, etc. [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%