2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-022-02904-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of Tumor Growth with Input from Patient-Specific Metabolomic Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite their model being inherently multi-scale, their in silico experiments were calibrated on macroscopic quantities, i.e., drug dose, injection time and duration, and tumor size. In the same year however, Miller et al 92 presented a multi-level approach that is unique in that it proposes to link tumor metabolomic measurements from patients into the mathematical model for tissue-scale behavior of a carcinoma progression or control, the development of angiogenesis, the effect of chemotherapy, etc. However, an important limitation of the cancer model concerns that its behavior depends mainly on the metabolomic data available, and how they are appropriately weighted and combined to determine the effect on the (mechanistic) model parameters.…”
Section: Agent-based Modeling In Cancer Biomedicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their model being inherently multi-scale, their in silico experiments were calibrated on macroscopic quantities, i.e., drug dose, injection time and duration, and tumor size. In the same year however, Miller et al 92 presented a multi-level approach that is unique in that it proposes to link tumor metabolomic measurements from patients into the mathematical model for tissue-scale behavior of a carcinoma progression or control, the development of angiogenesis, the effect of chemotherapy, etc. However, an important limitation of the cancer model concerns that its behavior depends mainly on the metabolomic data available, and how they are appropriately weighted and combined to determine the effect on the (mechanistic) model parameters.…”
Section: Agent-based Modeling In Cancer Biomedicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on biological and biomechanical principles, biomechanical models can explain emerging clinical behaviors and assess the effectiveness of therapeutic strategies. In recent years, mathematical models that combine tumor growth [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], angiogenesis [22][23][24][25][26][27], blood flow [28,29] and anticancer drugs [30][31][32][33] have been proposed to explore better treatment. Cell-based models directly simulate single cell behaviors and cell-cell interactions at subcellular and cellular scales on the basis of predefined rules [34,35], while most continuum models describe tumor dynamics through partial differential equations (PDEs) and avoid the disadvantages of large computational costs caused by discrete approaches at a large scale [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Biomechanical Models For Tumor Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since tumors are regarded as complex heterogenic tissues with hypoxic areas [ 209 ], the Warburg effect is one of the hallmarks of cancer favoring the suppression of normal oxidative phosphorylation and the adaptation to hypoxia [ 210 ] via upregulating HIF-1 and GLUT expression [ 207 ]. Metabolic products such as lactic acid, originating in tumor cells [ 211 , 212 , 213 ], may promote the spontaneous oxidation of ascorbate to DHA due to pH lowering within the tumor microenvironment [ 32 , 33 ]. Both GLUT-mediated DHA uptake as well as enhanced ascorbate oxidation to DHA may be initiated in the tumor [ 214 ].…”
Section: Dha Transportersmentioning
confidence: 99%