2011
DOI: 10.12693/aphyspola.119.950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of Tissues in vivo Heating Induced by Exposure to Therapeutic Ultrasound

Abstract: The aim of this work is mathematical modeling and numerical calculation in space and time of temperature fields induced by low power focused ultrasound beams in soft tissue in vivo after few minutes exposure time. These numerical predictions are indispensable for planning of various ultrasound therapeutic applications. Both, the acoustic pressure distribution and power density of heat sources induced in tissue, were calculated using the numerical solution to the second order nonlinear differential wave equatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phantom had cylindrical shape of diameter and height of 5 cm and 9 cm, respectively. The sample was positioned in a tank filled with temperature-controlled degassed distilled water [20,21]. Figure 1 shows the experimental setup which includes a generator (Agilent 332, Aprings Colorado, USA), an amplifier (ENI 1325LA, Rochester NY, USA), and an oscilloscope (Tektronix TDS3012B).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Phantom had cylindrical shape of diameter and height of 5 cm and 9 cm, respectively. The sample was positioned in a tank filled with temperature-controlled degassed distilled water [20,21]. Figure 1 shows the experimental setup which includes a generator (Agilent 332, Aprings Colorado, USA), an amplifier (ENI 1325LA, Rochester NY, USA), and an oscilloscope (Tektronix TDS3012B).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average power of focused ultrasound beam was 6 W. The focal zone was set at a depth of 30 mm within the phantom. A more comprehensive description of the experimental setup can be found in [20,21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increase is the most sensitive to variations of thermal conductivity, cf. [41]. Figure 9 showed the curve of temperature/time dependence during ultrasonic irradiation of the MNP16 sam- Ultrasonic specific absorption rate was the assessment of the goodness of fit of the temperature increase measured and calculated at the time of sonication less than 15 s. In Fig.…”
Section: Beam Size Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%