2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00161-021-01071-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of thermal and electrical conductivities by means of a viscoelastic Cosserat continuum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to explain the processes occurring in the electromagnet within the framework of our theory, it is necessary to add the conduction current Jc$\bm{\mathcal J}_c$ to the second equation in Equation (). Now, we do so by referring to Ivanova [45], where we introduce the conduction current and obtain the differential equations that describe electromagnetic processes in conductors. Thus, we replace Equation () by the equations ·Bgoodbreak=0,2em×Hgoodbreak=Jgoodbreak+bold-scriptJc,2emJgoodbreak=1χ0.16emH·bold-scriptDm,2em·bold-scriptDmTgoodbreak=bold-scriptQm,2emBgoodbreak=μ0[]E+ffalse(bold-scriptDmfalse)·boldfTfalse(bold-scriptDmfalse)·H.$$\begin{equation} \nabla \cdot \bm{\mathcal B} = 0, \qquad \nabla \times \bm{\mathcal H} = \bm{\mathcal J} + \bm{\mathcal J}_c, \qquad \bm{\mathcal J} = \frac{1}{\chi }\, \bm{\mathcal H} \cdot {\bm{\mathcal D}}_m, \qquad \nabla \cdot {\bm{\mathcal D}}_m^T = {\bm{\mathcal Q}}_m, \qquad \bm{\mathcal B} = \mu _0 \Bigl [\mathbf {E} + \mathbf {f}({\bm{\mathcal D}}_m) \cdot \mathbf {f}^T({\bm{\mathcal D}}_m)\Bigr ] \cdot \bm{\mathcal H}.…”
Section: Magnetostatics: a Comparison With The Classical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In order to explain the processes occurring in the electromagnet within the framework of our theory, it is necessary to add the conduction current Jc$\bm{\mathcal J}_c$ to the second equation in Equation (). Now, we do so by referring to Ivanova [45], where we introduce the conduction current and obtain the differential equations that describe electromagnetic processes in conductors. Thus, we replace Equation () by the equations ·Bgoodbreak=0,2em×Hgoodbreak=Jgoodbreak+bold-scriptJc,2emJgoodbreak=1χ0.16emH·bold-scriptDm,2em·bold-scriptDmTgoodbreak=bold-scriptQm,2emBgoodbreak=μ0[]E+ffalse(bold-scriptDmfalse)·boldfTfalse(bold-scriptDmfalse)·H.$$\begin{equation} \nabla \cdot \bm{\mathcal B} = 0, \qquad \nabla \times \bm{\mathcal H} = \bm{\mathcal J} + \bm{\mathcal J}_c, \qquad \bm{\mathcal J} = \frac{1}{\chi }\, \bm{\mathcal H} \cdot {\bm{\mathcal D}}_m, \qquad \nabla \cdot {\bm{\mathcal D}}_m^T = {\bm{\mathcal Q}}_m, \qquad \bm{\mathcal B} = \mu _0 \Bigl [\mathbf {E} + \mathbf {f}({\bm{\mathcal D}}_m) \cdot \mathbf {f}^T({\bm{\mathcal D}}_m)\Bigr ] \cdot \bm{\mathcal H}.…”
Section: Magnetostatics: a Comparison With The Classical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to explain the processes occurring in the electromagnet within the framework of our theory, it is necessary to add the conduction current 𝓙 𝑐 to the second equation in Equation ( 87). Now, we do so by referring to Ivanova [45], where we introduce the conduction current and obtain the differential equations that describe electromagnetic processes in conductors. Thus, we replace Equation (87) by the equations…”
Section: Magnetostatics: a Comparison With The Classical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations