2012
DOI: 10.1134/s1063783412080318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of the γ → α transformation in steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Austenite decomposition model describes this process under continuous cooling condition for low alloyed steels with formation of all practically important structural components (ferrite, pearlite, bainite of different morphology and martesite). Physically based mathematical models of ferrite, pearlite and bainite transformations are described in [4,5].…”
Section: Austenite Microstructure Evolution Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Austenite decomposition model describes this process under continuous cooling condition for low alloyed steels with formation of all practically important structural components (ferrite, pearlite, bainite of different morphology and martesite). Physically based mathematical models of ferrite, pearlite and bainite transformations are described in [4,5].…”
Section: Austenite Microstructure Evolution Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model (AusTran) makes it possible to describe austenite transformation in low alloyed steels with formation of all practically important structural components (ferrite, pearlite, bainite of different morphology and martesite). Physically based models of the ferrite and pearlite transformations are described in detail elsewhere [3]. Kinetics of the martensite transformation is calculated using an empirical model from literature [4].…”
Section: Mathematical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creation of a new generation of integral hot rolling models is possible when using physically justified sub-models of the separate processes of structure formation based on reliable approaches to calculation of the thermodynamic and kinetic process parameters with an accurate account of the alloying effects. A set of such sub-models, which employ new approaches to a quantitative description of the dependence of key kinetic parameters of the analyzed processes on chemical composition, was created by the authors, and was partially introduced in earlier works [2,3]. As a result of uniting the sub-models of separate processes [2] we created the model (computer program) AusEvol+, which is able to quantitatively predict the complex evolution of the microstructure of austenite during hot deformation of steel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A large, plate-like form of quenched martensite with a body-centered cubic (BCC) {112}〈111〉-type twin structure as its substructure is easily formed in high-carbon steels or alloys with a low M s (martensite start temperature), whereas the martensite in low-carbon steels, normally called lath martensite, has been suggested to have a dislocation structure as its lath substructure after quenching. These different substructures have resulted in the suggestion of various kinds of transition mechanisms from austenite (γ-Fe) to ferrite (α-Fe) 1 – 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%