2018
DOI: 10.1002/mana.201700228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of the unsteady flow through a channel with an artificial outflow condition by the Navier–Stokes variational inequality

Abstract: We prove the global in time existence of a weak solution to the variational inequality of the Navier–Stokes type, simulating the unsteady flow of a viscous fluid through the channel, with the so‐called “do nothing” boundary condition on the outflow. The condition that the solution lies in a certain given, however arbitrarily large, convex set and the use of the variational inequality enables us to derive an energy‐type estimate of the solution. We also discuss the use of a series of other possible outflow “do … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A different approach has been suggested in papers [13][14][15]. There the authors have considered the stationary and non-stationary problems and impose an additional condition on Γ 2 , that enables one to estimate the kinetic energy of a possible reverse flow and obtain an a priori estimate of the energy type.…”
Section: On Some Previous Related Existential Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A different approach has been suggested in papers [13][14][15]. There the authors have considered the stationary and non-stationary problems and impose an additional condition on Γ 2 , that enables one to estimate the kinetic energy of a possible reverse flow and obtain an a priori estimate of the energy type.…”
Section: On Some Previous Related Existential Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at first on the level of approximations and then considering an appropriate limit transition) in papers [14] and [15]. However, it must be noted that while the convex set, corresponding to our K c t , is defined in a rather artificial way in [14] and [15], our K c t has a good physical sense. Naturally, the change of set K c t requires a new technique in the derivation of approximations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At present, (DN) is a well-established boundary condition to represent natural outflows (see, e.g., [7] and the references therein). For a recent discussion on the derivation and physical meaning of the do-nothing condition (DN), we refer to [31].…”
Section: Re ∂V ∂Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was introduced by Bruneau and Fabrie in [13] and then followed by several authors (see, e.g., [2,12,19,33]). The other is due to Kračmar and Neustupa and consists in supplementing the do-nothing condition by a bound for the backflows (see [29][30][31]).…”
Section: Re ∂V ∂Nmentioning
confidence: 99%