2008
DOI: 10.12693/aphyspola.113.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of the Surface Impedance of Conductive Ferromagnetic Films on Different Substrates

Abstract: The microwave surface impedance of conductive ferromagnetic films hypothetically deposited on dielectric, metal and superconducting substrates was numerically investigated for the case when the film is tangentially magnetized. It was shown that the surface impedance is governed by the ferromagnetic film conductivity if the film is thin enough. Peculiarities of the impedance caused by the ferromagnetic resonance arise more clearly in thicker ferromagnetic films or in films deposited on substrates of higher perm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a strict sense this frequency must be the same than the microwaves that are being employed for heating. However, Joule Effect for these materials is somehow controversial 6), 7) and without leaving out that impedance is highly sensitive to frequency, there are reports 8) showing strong increments of both, resistance and reactance, at 1 MHz in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3. It was considered in this work that using DC resistance approach gives a conservative figure for considering in the model.…”
Section: Experimental Arrangementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a strict sense this frequency must be the same than the microwaves that are being employed for heating. However, Joule Effect for these materials is somehow controversial 6), 7) and without leaving out that impedance is highly sensitive to frequency, there are reports 8) showing strong increments of both, resistance and reactance, at 1 MHz in La0.7Sr0.3MnO3. It was considered in this work that using DC resistance approach gives a conservative figure for considering in the model.…”
Section: Experimental Arrangementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed during the analysis of the permittivity that as this value was increased, the electric field and the power absorption were decreasing, and consequently, the temperatures calculated by the model were lower than the experimental ones (Eqs. [7][8][9]. This difference can be compensated in the model with higher dielectric losses, which means that values of electric permittivity obtained with the supposition of purely resistive heating, corresponds to the minimal values of permittivity of the manganite.…”
Section: Jcs-japanmentioning
confidence: 99%