2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.12.142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of the molybdenum loss in iron molybdate catalyst pellets for selective oxidation of methanol to formaldehyde

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the literature [49,54], it seemed the MoO 3 evaporation from the industrial catalyst pellets (ring shaped cylinders with outer diameter = 4.55 mm, hole diameter = 1.70 mm, and length = 4.00 mm) was a diffusion limited process, as it took much longer time for the excess MoO 3 to disappear from pellets than the sieve fraction used here (150-250 µm), under similar conditions. Additionally, a reactor model indicated that reducing MoO 3 evaporation only for the catalyst layer near the inlet might to a large extent solve the problem of increasing pressure drop [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…From the literature [49,54], it seemed the MoO 3 evaporation from the industrial catalyst pellets (ring shaped cylinders with outer diameter = 4.55 mm, hole diameter = 1.70 mm, and length = 4.00 mm) was a diffusion limited process, as it took much longer time for the excess MoO 3 to disappear from pellets than the sieve fraction used here (150-250 µm), under similar conditions. Additionally, a reactor model indicated that reducing MoO 3 evaporation only for the catalyst layer near the inlet might to a large extent solve the problem of increasing pressure drop [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…[15,16] The re-oxidation to Fe 2 (MoO 4 ) 3 was slow and only partly reversible, possibly caused by the lack of excess MoO 3 . [20] Inspection by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that the volatilization of MoO 3 occurred from the outer pellet surface and formed a depletion layer where all MoO 3 had evaporated and a pellet core where the composition is like the fresh catalyst. Our group has studied the deactivation and degradation of a FeMo catalyst at about 400°C, with Mo/Fe = 2.0 for up to 600 h on stream using a catalyst sieve fraction of 150 to 250 μm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above the volatile Mo-species are observed to deposit in the void space between the catalyst pellets downstream in the reactor [14], [16]- [19]. In our group, we have experimentally studied and modeled the Mo loss from a single iron molybdate/molybdenum oxide pellet under well-defined reaction conditions [21]. It was observed that the Mo loss was strongly dependent on the MeOH concentration corresponding to a reaction order of 1.5, and was inhibited by H 2 O.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we present an implementation of our previous single pellet model [21] into a reactor model and show simulation results for the vaporization and downstream deposition of MoO 3 and the development of the pressure drop over time. A study on catalyst modifications to minimize the pressure drop increase is also presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%