2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling of the Lithium Calendering Process for Direct Contact Prelithiation of Lithium-Ion Batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of the publication, the validation was successfully carried out for the initial foil thickness h 0 ¼ 50 μm, similar to Stumper et al, [24] which leads to the confirmation that the modified model is also valid.…”
Section: Modeling Of the Lithium Calendering Processmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the context of the publication, the validation was successfully carried out for the initial foil thickness h 0 ¼ 50 μm, similar to Stumper et al, [24] which leads to the confirmation that the modified model is also valid.…”
Section: Modeling Of the Lithium Calendering Processmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Schematic structure of the process model for the calendering of lithium foil with the considered process parameters and geometric variables of the lithium foil. [24] thickness of the lithium foil after calendering ĥ1 . The prediction is only valid in the factor space considered, which is outlined in green in Figure 2a.…”
Section: Modeling Of the Lithium Calendering Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[86] Compared to the extrusion process, the rolling process is more costly, and the number of rolling steps increases the cost of the process. [87] To minimize this, Stumper et al [88] studied the effect of the lithium foil geometries, line load, and roller temperature on the deformation behavior of the lithium foil to stablish a semiempirical model to predict the lithium processing and validity ranges. Unfortunately, the densification toward 0% has still not been solved by the industry.…”
Section: Rollingmentioning
confidence: 99%